From: "Kumar, Kaushlendra" <kaushlendra.kumar@intel.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] tools/mm/slabinfo: recognize --partial/-p option
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 10:43:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <LV3PR11MB876896644D26432F92500615F5A2A@LV3PR11MB8768.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTaeUEnPFIO0lxWX@hyeyoo>
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2025 3:16 PM
To: Kumar, Kaushlendra <kaushlendra.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org; linux-mm@kvack.org; vbabka@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/mm/slabinfo: recognize --partial/-p option
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 02:40:18PM +0530, Kaushlendra Kumar wrote:
> The long option "partial" maps to 'p' but the short options string and
> switch handled 'P', causing -p/--partial to be rejected as invalid.
> Use lowercase 'p' consistently in the getopt short string and the
> switch to enable sorting by partial slabs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaushlendra Kumar <kaushlendra.kumar@intel.com>
> ---
I think breaking an existing option -P is not a good idea.
Can we make --Partial work instead of breaking -P option?
> tools/mm/slabinfo.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/mm/slabinfo.c b/tools/mm/slabinfo.c index
> 7c51d283504d..7f239da26ed2 100644
> --- a/tools/mm/slabinfo.c
> +++ b/tools/mm/slabinfo.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static void usage(void)
> "-n|--numa Show NUMA information\n"
> "-N|--lines=K Show the first K slabs\n"
> "-o|--ops Show kmem_cache_ops\n"
> - "-P|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs\n"
> + "-p|--partial Sort by number of partial slabs\n"
> "-r|--report Detailed report on single slabs\n"
> "-s|--shrink Shrink slabs\n"
> "-S|--Size Sort by size\n"
> @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> page_size = getpagesize();
>
> - while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "aABd::DefhilLnN:oPrsStTUvXz1",
> + while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "aABd::DefhilLnN:oprsStTUvXz1",
> opts, NULL)) != -1)
> switch (c) {
> case 'a':
> @@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> case 'r':
> show_report = 1;
> break;
> - case 'P':
> + case 'p': On Mon, Dec 08, 2025, Harry Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 02:40:18PM +0530, Kaushlendra Kumar wrote:
>> The long option "partial" maps to 'p' but the short options string and
>> switch handled 'P', causing -p/--partial to be rejected as invalid.
>> Use lowercase 'p' consistently in the getopt short string and the
>> switch to enable sorting by partial slabs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kaushlendra Kumar <kaushlendra.kumar@intel.com>
>> ---
>
> I think breaking an existing option -P is not a good idea.
> Can we make --Partial work instead of breaking -P option?
Thanks for catching this. You're right-changing -P to -p would break
existing scripts relying on the uppercase flag.
I'll respin the patch to keep -P working.
Will send v2 shortly.
-Kaushlendra
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-08 9:10 Kaushlendra Kumar
2025-12-08 9:45 ` Harry Yoo
2025-12-08 10:43 ` Kumar, Kaushlendra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=LV3PR11MB876896644D26432F92500615F5A2A@LV3PR11MB8768.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=kaushlendra.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox