From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Make MIGRATE_ISOLATE a standalone bit
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 20:20:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FCED1CCE-B9A9-4B8B-9319-B1002848AC3B@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fed40607-edcd-4338-85ae-7656a374728b@suse.cz>
On 17 May 2025, at 16:26, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 5/9/25 22:01, Zi Yan wrote:
>> Hi David and Oscar,
>>
>> Can you take a look at Patch 2, which changes how online_pages() set
>> online pageblock migratetypes? It used to first set all pageblocks to
>> MIGRATE_ISOLATE, then let undo_isolate_page_range() move the pageblocks
>> to MIGRATE_MOVABLE. After MIGRATE_ISOLATE becomes a standalone bit, all
>> online pageblocks need to have a migratetype other than MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
>> Let me know if there is any issue with my changes.
>>
>> Hi Johannes,
>>
>> Patch 2 now have set_pageblock_migratetype() not accepting
>> MIGRATE_ISOLATE. I think it makes code better. Thank you for the great
>> feedback.
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patchset moves MIGRATE_ISOLATE to a standalone bit to avoid
>> being overwritten during pageblock isolation process. Currently,
>> MIGRATE_ISOLATE is part of enum migratetype (in include/linux/mmzone.h),
>> thus, setting a pageblock to MIGRATE_ISOLATE overwrites its original
>> migratetype. This causes pageblock migratetype loss during
>> alloc_contig_range() and memory offline, especially when the process
>> fails due to a failed pageblock isolation and the code tries to undo the
>> finished pageblock isolations.
>
> Seems mostly fine to me, just sent suggestion for 4/4.
Thanks.
> I was kinda hoping that MIGRATE_ISOLATE could stop being a migratetype. But
> I also see that it's useful for it to be because then it means it has the
> freelists in the buddy allocator, can work via __move_freepages_block() etc.
Yeah, I wanted to remove MIGRATE_ISOLATE from migratetype too, but there
is a MIGRATE_ISOLATE freelist and /proc/pagetypeinfo also shows isolated
free pages.
> Oh well. So it's still a migratetype, but the pageblock handling is now
> different.
Yep. We also have PB_migrate_skip, a bit in pageblock_bits used for memory
compaction and not part of migratetype.
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-18 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 20:01 Zi Yan
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/page_isolation: make page isolation " Zi Yan
2025-05-13 11:32 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-05-13 14:53 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 8:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 15:08 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 16:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 17:15 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-21 11:16 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-21 11:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 12:00 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-21 12:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 12:18 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype from move_freepages_block_isolate() Zi Yan
2025-05-12 6:25 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-12 16:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-12 16:13 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-12 16:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-12 16:28 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-12 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-12 23:20 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 8:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 23:06 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 8:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype from undo_isolate_page_range() Zi Yan
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype parameter from more functions Zi Yan
2025-05-17 20:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-18 0:07 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-18 16:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-05-18 17:24 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-17 20:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Make MIGRATE_ISOLATE a standalone bit Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-18 0:20 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-05-19 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 14:35 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 8:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 13:18 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 13:31 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 14:07 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 7:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 14:01 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FCED1CCE-B9A9-4B8B-9319-B1002848AC3B@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=richardycc@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox