linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 8632/11398] mm/page_alloc.c:6773:62: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 19:54:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <FB67B6A6-8691-4AA3-A418-CD19C881D74B@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202507220742.P3SaKlI6-lkp@intel.com>

On 21 Jul 2025, at 19:35, kernel test robot wrote:

> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head:   97987520025658f30bb787a99ffbd9bbff9ffc9d
> commit: d1554fb6302093d353c8bf4601f9bf994b836904 [8632/11398] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype parameter from more functions
> config: arm64-randconfig-r132-20250721 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250722/202507220742.P3SaKlI6-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250722/202507220742.P3SaKlI6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507220742.P3SaKlI6-lkp@intel.com/
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>> mm/page_alloc.c:6773:62: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@     expected unsigned long nr_migrated @@     got restricted acr_flags_t [usertype] alloc_flags @@
>    mm/page_alloc.c:6773:62: sparse:     expected unsigned long nr_migrated
>    mm/page_alloc.c:6773:62: sparse:     got restricted acr_flags_t [usertype] alloc_flags
>>> mm/page_alloc.c:6776:50: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 6 (different base types) @@     expected restricted acr_flags_t [usertype] alloc_flags @@     got unsigned long [assigned] total_mapped @@
>    mm/page_alloc.c:6776:50: sparse:     expected restricted acr_flags_t [usertype] alloc_flags
>    mm/page_alloc.c:6776:50: sparse:     got unsigned long [assigned] total_mapped
>    mm/page_alloc.c:1526:13: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'free_one_page' - different lock contexts for basic block
>    mm/page_alloc.c:2520:12: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'rmqueue_bulk' - different lock contexts for basic block
>    mm/page_alloc.c:2878:13: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in '__free_frozen_pages' - different lock contexts for basic block
>    mm/page_alloc.c:2981:33: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'free_unref_folios' - unexpected unlock
>    mm/page_alloc.c:3271:20: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'rmqueue_pcplist' - different lock contexts for basic block
>    mm/page_alloc.c:3143:13: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'get_page_from_freelist' - different lock contexts for basic block
>    mm/page_alloc.c:5099:9: sparse: sparse: context imbalance in 'alloc_pages_bulk_noprof' - different lock contexts for basic block
>
> vim +6773 mm/page_alloc.c

<snip>

>   6772	
>> 6773		trace_mm_alloc_contig_migrate_range_info(start, end, alloc_flags,
>   6774							 total_migrated,
>   6775							 total_reclaimed,
>> 6776							 total_mapped);
>   6777		return (ret < 0) ? ret : 0;
>   6778	}
>   6779	

It seems that the original patch only moved migratetype from third parameter
to the last one[1], so the trace event has been useless since it was
added. My patch was just a mechanic change.

No one seems to notice the issue so far, maybe the trace event can be removed.

(Add other page allocator maintainer + David)

Hi Richard,

Let me know if this trace event is still useful to you. Otherwise, I am going
to send a patch to remove it.

Thanks.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240228051127.2859472-1-richardycc@google.com/T/#u

Best Regards,
Yan, Zi


      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-21 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21 23:35 kernel test robot
2025-07-21 23:54 ` Zi Yan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=FB67B6A6-8691-4AA3-A418-CD19C881D74B@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=richardycc@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox