Re: [Patch v2] selftests/mm: do check_huge_anon() with a number been passed in

[Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>]

On 9 Aug 2025, at 15:42, Wei Yang wrote:

> Currently it hard codes the number of hugepage to check for
> check_huge_anon(), but it would be more reasonable to do the check based
> on a number passed in.
>
> Pass in the hugepage number and do the check based on it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>
> ---
> v2:
>   * use mm-new
>   * add back nr_hpages which is removed by an early commit
>   * adjust the change log a little
>   * drop RB and resend
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

LGTM. Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>

Best Regards,
Yan, Zi