From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3] splice: fix race with page invalidation
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:45:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1KOIYA-0002FG-Rg@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807301310130.3334@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (message from Linus Torvalds on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:13:48 -0700 (PDT))
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >
> > Take this patch as a bugfix. It's not in any way showing the way
> > forward: as soon as you have the time, you can revert it and start
> > from the current state.
> >
> > Hmm?
>
> I dislike that mentality.
>
> The fact is, it's not a bug-fix, it's just papering over the real problem.
It _is_ a bug fix. See here, from man 2 splice:
RETURN VALUE
Upon successful completion, splice() returns the number of bytes
spliced to or from the pipe. A return value of 0 means that there was
no data to transfer, and it would not make sense to block, because
there are no writers connected to the write end of the pipe referred to
by fd_in.
Currently splice on NFS, FUSE and a few other filesystems don't
conform to that clause: splice can return zero even if there's still
data to be read, just because the data happened to be invalidated
during the splicing. That's a plain and clear bug, which has
absolutely nothing to do with NFS _exporting_.
> And by papering it over, it then just makes people less likely to bother
> with the real issue.
I think you are talking about a totally separate issue: that NFSD's
use of splice can result in strange things if the file is truncated
while being read. But this is an NFSD issue and I don't see that it
has _anything_ to do with the above bug in splice. I think you are
just confusing the two things.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-30 9:43 Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 17:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 17:54 ` Jens Axboe
2008-07-30 18:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 18:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 19:45 ` Jens Axboe
2008-07-30 20:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 20:45 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2008-07-30 20:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 21:16 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-30 21:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-30 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 0:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 0:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 0:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 6:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 10:26 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-31 12:33 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 12:49 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 13:29 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-07-31 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 16:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 17:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-31 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 7:30 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-07-31 2:16 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 12:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-31 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-31 18:13 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-08-01 1:22 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-01 18:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-08-01 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-02 4:26 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-04 15:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-05 2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-11 3:22 ` Michael Kerrisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1KOIYA-0002FG-Rg@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox