From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 In-reply-to: <20070406040035.2f1e1105.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (message from Andrew Morton on Fri, 6 Apr 2007 04:00:35 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] mm: per BDI congestion feedback References: <20070405174209.498059336@programming.kicks-ass.net> <20070405174320.649550491@programming.kicks-ass.net> <20070405162425.eb78c701.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1175842917.6483.130.camel@twins> <20070406040035.2f1e1105.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:10:55 +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, dgc@sgi.com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, nikita@clusterfs.com List-ID: > > OK, so you disagree with Miklos' 2nd point here: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/4/137 > > Yup, silly man thought that "congestion_wait" has something to do with > congestion ;) I think it sort-of used to, once. Oh well. I _usually_ do actually read the code, but this seemed so obvious... I'll learn never to trust descriptive function names. Miklos -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org