From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: staubach@redhat.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hugh@veritas.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update ctime and mtime for mmaped write
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:23:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1HJw7l-0003Tq-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45DC8A47.5050900@redhat.com> (message from Peter Staubach on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:07:03 -0500)
> > Inspired by Peter Staubach's patch and the resulting comments.
> >
> >
>
> An updated version of the original patch was submitted to LKML
> yesterday... :-)
Strange coincidence :)
> > file = vma->vm_file;
> > start = vma->vm_end;
> > + mapping_update_time(file);
> > if ((flags & MS_SYNC) && file &&
> > (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> > get_file(file);
> >
>
> It seems to me that this might lead to file times being updated for
> non-MAP_SHARED mappings.
In theory no, because the COW-ed pages become anonymous and are not
part of the original mapping any more.
> > +int set_page_dirty_mapping(struct page *page);
> >
>
> This aspect of the design seems intrusive to me. I didn't see a strong
> reason to introduce new versions of many of the routines just to handle
> these semantics. What motivated this part of your design? Why the new
> _mapping versions of routines?
Because there's no way to know inside the set_page_dirty() functions
if the dirtying comes from a memory mapping or from a modification
through a normal write(). And they have different semantics, for
write() the modification times are updated immediately.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 17:51 Miklos Szeredi, Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:07 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:23 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2007-02-21 18:54 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 19:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:36 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:16 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:11 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 20:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:50 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-21 18:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-21 18:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-21 18:50 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-21 18:50 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 4:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-22 7:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 17:39 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 18:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:14 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 20:48 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 20:55 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 21:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-02-22 21:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-02-22 21:52 ` Peter Staubach
2007-02-22 22:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1HJw7l-0003Tq-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=staubach@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox