Re: MM patches against 2.5.31

[Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>]

On Wednesday 28 August 2002 23:03, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > 
> > Going right back to basics, what do you suppose is wrong with the 2.4
> > strategy of always doing the lru removal in free_pages_ok?
> 
> That's equivalent to what we have at present, which is:
> 
> 	if (put_page_testzero(page)) {
> 		/* window here */
> 		lru_cache_del(page);
> 		__free_pages_ok(page, 0);
> 	}
> 
> versus:
> 
> 	spin_lock(lru lock);
> 	page = list_entry(lru, ...);
> 	if (page_count(page) == 0)
> 		continue;
> 	/* window here */
> 	page_cache_get(page);
> 	page_cache_release(page);	/* double-free */

Indeed it is.  In 2.4.19 we have:

(vmscan.c: shrink_cache)                        (page_alloc.c: __free_pages)

365       if (unlikely(!page_count(page)))
366               continue;
					        444         if (!PageReserved(page) && put_page_testzero(page))
          [many twisty paths, all different]
511       /* effectively free the page here */
512       page_cache_release(page);
					        445                 __free_pages_ok(page, order);
                                                [free it again just to make sure]

So there's no question that the race is lurking in 2.4.  I noticed several
more paths besides the one above that look suspicious as well.  The bottom
line is, 2.4 needs a fix along the lines of my suggestion or Christian's,
something that can actually be proved.

It's a wonder that this problem manifests so rarely in practice.

-- 
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/