From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: [RFC] start_aggressive_readahead Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 08:53:25 +0200 References: <20020725181059.A25857@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20020725181059.A25857@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Hellwig , torvalds@transmeta.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thursday 25 July 2002 18:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'm also open for a better name (I think the current one is very bad, > but don't have a better idea :)). I'd also be ineterested in comments > how to avoid the new function and use existing functionality for it, > but I've tried to find it for a long time and didn't find something > suiteable. That's the right attitude imho. Redoing reahead needs to be a project all by itself, a fine thing to experiment with in the stable series. A bad idea that sort of works for now is better than what we've got. -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/