From: "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
To: "Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: page: add volatile memory copy methods
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 14:14:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DG1ZJ1350EMS.1S1360PA496QG@garyguo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877bszrz37.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
On Fri Jan 30, 2026 at 1:48 PM GMT, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net> writes:
>
>> On Fri Jan 30, 2026 at 12:33 PM GMT, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> When copying data from buffers that are mapped to user space, or from
>>> buffers that are used for dma, it is impossible to guarantee absence of
>>> concurrent memory operations on those buffers. Copying data to/from `Page`
>>> from/to these buffers would be undefined behavior if regular memcpy
>>> operations are used.
>>>
>>> The operation can be made well defined, if the buffers that potentially
>>> observe racy operations can be said to exist outside of any Rust
>>> allocation. For this to be true, the kernel must only interact with the
>>> buffers using raw volatile reads and writes.
>>>
>>> Add methods on `Page` to read and write the contents using volatile
>>> operations.
>>>
>>> Also improve clarity by specifying additional requirements on
>>> `read_raw`/`write_raw` methods regarding concurrent operations on involved
>>> buffers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> rust/kernel/page.rs | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/page.rs b/rust/kernel/page.rs
>>> index 432fc0297d4a8..6568a0d3b3baa 100644
>>> --- a/rust/kernel/page.rs
>>> +++ b/rust/kernel/page.rs
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>> bindings,
>>> error::code::*,
>>> error::Result,
>>> + ffi::c_void,
>>> uaccess::UserSliceReader,
>>> };
>>> use core::{
>>> @@ -260,6 +261,8 @@ fn with_pointer_into_page<T>(
>>> /// # Safety
>>> ///
>>> /// * Callers must ensure that `dst` is valid for writing `len` bytes.
>>> + /// * Callers must ensure that there are no other concurrent reads or writes to/from the
>>> + /// destination memory region.
>>> /// * Callers must ensure that this call does not race with a write to the same page that
>>> /// overlaps with this read.
>>> pub unsafe fn read_raw(&self, dst: *mut u8, offset: usize, len: usize) -> Result {
>>> @@ -274,6 +277,30 @@ pub unsafe fn read_raw(&self, dst: *mut u8, offset: usize, len: usize) -> Result
>>> })
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /// Maps the page and reads from it into the given IO memory region using volatile memory
>>> + /// operations.
>>> + ///
>>> + /// This method will perform bounds checks on the page offset. If `offset .. offset+len` goes
>>> + /// outside of the page, then this call returns [`EINVAL`].
>>> + ///
>>> + /// # Safety
>>> + /// Callers must ensure that:
>>> + ///
>>> + /// * The destination memory region is outside of any Rust memory allocation.
>>> + /// * The destination memory region is writable.
>>> + /// * This call does not race with a write to the same source page that overlaps with this read.
>>> + pub unsafe fn read_raw_toio(&self, dst: *mut u8, offset: usize, len: usize) -> Result {
>>> + self.with_pointer_into_page(offset, len, move |src| {
>>> + // SAFETY: If `with_pointer_into_page` calls into this closure, then
>>> + // it has performed a bounds check and guarantees that `src` is
>>> + // valid for `len` bytes.
>>> + //
>>> + // There caller guarantees that there is no data race at the source.
>>> + unsafe { bindings::memcpy_toio(dst.cast::<c_void>(), src.cast::<c_void>(), len) };
>>
>> I feel that this should be a generic utility that integrates with our IO infra
>> that allows you to copy/from IO to a slice.
>
> While that might also be useful, for my particular use case I am copying
> between two pages. One is mapped from user space, the other one is
> allocated by a driver. No slices involved. Pasting for reference [1]:
Then what you need is a byte-wise atomic memcpy, not memcpy_{from,to}io.
Best,
Gary
>
>
> /// Copy data to the current page of this segment from `src_page`.
> ///
> /// Copies `PAGE_SIZE - (self.offset() % PAGE_SIZE` bytes of data from `src_page` to this
> /// segment starting at `self.offset()` from offset `self.offset() % PAGE_SIZE`. This call
> /// will advance offset and reduce length of `self`.
> ///
> /// Returns the number of bytes copied.
> pub fn copy_from_page(&mut self, src_page: &Page, src_offset: usize) -> usize {
> let dst_offset = self.offset() % PAGE_SIZE;
> debug_assert!(src_offset <= PAGE_SIZE);
> let length = (PAGE_SIZE - dst_offset)
> .min(self.len() as usize)
> .min(PAGE_SIZE - src_offset);
> let page_idx = self.offset() / PAGE_SIZE;
>
> // SAFETY: self.bio_vec is valid and thus bv_page must be a valid
> // pointer to a `struct page`.
> let dst_page = unsafe { Page::from_raw(self.bio_vec.bv_page.add(page_idx)) };
>
> dst_page
> .with_pointer_into_page(dst_offset, length, |dst| {
> // SAFETY:
> // - If `with_pointer_into_page` calls this closure, then it has performed bounds
> // checks and guarantees that `dst` is valid for `length` bytes.
> // - Since we have a shared reference to `src_page`, the read cannot race with any
> // writes to `src_page`.
> unsafe { src_page.read_raw_toio(dst, src_offset, length) }
> })
> .expect("Assertion failure, bounds check failed.");
>
> self.advance(length as u32)
> .expect("Assertion failure, bounds check failed.");
>
> length
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas Hindborg
>
> [1] https://github.com/metaspace/linux/blob/3e46e95f0707fa71259b1d241f689144ad61cc62/rust/kernel/block/bio/vec.rs#L142
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-30 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-30 12:33 Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-30 13:10 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-30 13:48 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-30 14:14 ` Gary Guo [this message]
2026-01-30 14:42 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-30 15:04 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-30 15:23 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-30 15:48 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-30 16:20 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-30 21:41 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-31 7:22 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-31 13:34 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-31 16:09 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-31 20:30 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-31 20:48 ` Gary Guo
2026-01-31 21:31 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-03 1:07 ` Boqun Feng
2026-02-04 13:16 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-04 13:48 ` Alice Ryhl
2026-02-04 15:58 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-02-04 16:12 ` Gary Guo
2026-02-12 14:21 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-31 16:26 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-31 20:14 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-31 13:19 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-31 16:43 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-31 19:10 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-01-31 19:30 ` Boqun Feng
2026-01-31 20:20 ` Andreas Hindborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DG1ZJ1350EMS.1S1360PA496QG@garyguo.net \
--to=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox