* [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep
@ 2025-12-09 5:44 Brendan Jackman
2025-12-09 6:36 ` Brendan Jackman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Jackman @ 2025-12-09 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Brendan Jackman
The only reason vmap_range_noflush() can sleep is because of pagetable
allocations.
The actual allocation mechanism is arch-specific so might_alloc()
doesn't work here (what GFP flags would be used?). Hence, just add a
comment.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Switched from might_alloc() to keeping might_sleep() + comment
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v1-1-94a9bb8ecb08@google.com
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index a53c7462671bdd896f95712af71398ffbe22fb80..c23d378dd4446e2784505ec3d5bb9568fb0d3c9a 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ static int vmap_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
int err;
pgtbl_mod_mask mask = 0;
+ /* Might allocate pagetables. */
might_sleep();
BUG_ON(addr >= end);
---
base-commit: ecc46e02e0abe025a6e840cba2d647f23fd1d721
change-id: 20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-754a791e4e10
Best regards,
--
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep
2025-12-09 5:44 [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep Brendan Jackman
@ 2025-12-09 6:36 ` Brendan Jackman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Jackman @ 2025-12-09 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brendan Jackman, Andrew Morton, Uladzislau Rezki
Cc: Anshuman Khandual, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Tue Dec 9, 2025 at 5:44 AM UTC, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> The only reason vmap_range_noflush() can sleep is because of pagetable
> allocations.
>
> The actual allocation mechanism is arch-specific so might_alloc()
> doesn't work here (what GFP flags would be used?). Hence, just add a
> comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Switched from might_alloc() to keeping might_sleep() + comment
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251208-b4-vmalloc-might_alloc-v1-1-94a9bb8ecb08@google.com
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index a53c7462671bdd896f95712af71398ffbe22fb80..c23d378dd4446e2784505ec3d5bb9568fb0d3c9a 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ static int vmap_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> int err;
> pgtbl_mod_mask mask = 0;
>
> + /* Might allocate pagetables. */
I just realised that for x86, there's also TLB shootdowns in
pud_free_pmd_page() etc. So I guess this is also a might_ for the the
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled() in smp_call_function_many_cond(). Should
probably mention that too.
Anything else I missed, before I send v3?
> might_sleep();
> BUG_ON(addr >= end);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-09 6:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-09 5:44 [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: clarify why vmap_range_noflush() might sleep Brendan Jackman
2025-12-09 6:36 ` Brendan Jackman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox