From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: memory offline infinite loop after soft offline
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 22:46:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DE0721DF-9E5C-4719-B382-01A4A74C04AD@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021031641.GA8007@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
> On Oct 20, 2019, at 11:16 PM, Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 07:56:09AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2019, at 2:35 AM, Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> You're right, then I don't see how this happens. If the error hugepage was
>> isolated without having PG_hwpoison set, it's unexpected and problematic.
>> I'm testing myself with v5.4-rc2 (simply ran move_pages12 and did hotremove
>> /hotadd)
>> but don't reproduce the issue yet. Do we need specific kernel version/
>> config
>> to trigger this?
>>
>>
>> This is reproducible on linux-next with the config. Not sure if it is
>> reproducible on x86.
>>
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cailca/linux-mm/master/powerpc.config
>>
>> and kernel cmdline if that matters
>>
>> page_poison=on page_owner=on numa_balancing=enable \
>> systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 debug_guardpage_minorder=1 \
>> page_alloc.shuffle=1
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
>>
>> BTW, where does the code set PG_hwpoison for the head page?
>
> Precisely speaking, soft offline only sets PG_hwpoison after the target
> hugepage is successfully dissolved (then it's not a hugepage any more),
> so PG_hwpoison is set on the raw page in set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page().
>
> In move_pages12 case, madvise(MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) is called for the range
> of 2 hugepages, so the expected result is that page offset 0 and 512
> are marked as PG_hwpoison after injection.
>
> Looking at your dump_page() output, the end_pfn is page offset 1
> ("page:c00c000800458040" is likely to point to pfn 0x11601.)
> The page belongs to high order buddy free page, but doesn't have
> PageBuddy nor PageHWPoison because it was not the head page or
> the raw error page.
>
>> Unfortunately, this does not solve the problem. It looks to me that in
>> soft_offline_huge_page(), set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() will only set
>> PG_hwpoison for buddy pages, so the even the compound_head() has no PG_hwpoison
>> set.
>
> Your analysis is totally correct, and this behavior will be fixed by
> the change (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/17/551) in Oscar's rework.
> The raw error page will be taken off from buddy system and the other
> subpages are properly split into lower orderer pages (we'll properly
> manage PageBuddy flags). So all possible cases would be covered by
> branches in __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock.
Naoya, Oscar, it looks like this series was stuck.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/17/551
I can still reproduce this issue as today. Maybe it is best we could post a single patch (which one?) to fix the loop first?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-15 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 21:32 Qian Cai
2019-10-12 10:30 ` osalvador
2019-10-14 8:39 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-17 9:34 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2019-10-17 10:01 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-17 10:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-17 18:07 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-17 18:27 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 2:19 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2019-10-18 6:06 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 6:32 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2019-10-18 7:33 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 8:46 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2019-10-18 11:56 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-21 3:16 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2020-05-15 2:46 ` Qian Cai [this message]
2020-05-15 3:48 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2019-10-18 8:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-18 8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-18 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 11:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-18 11:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-18 11:34 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 11:51 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DE0721DF-9E5C-4719-B382-01A4A74C04AD@lca.pw \
--to=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox