linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bridgman, John" <John.Bridgman@amd.com>
To: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>,
	"Gabbay, Oded" <Oded.Gabbay@amd.com>,
	"Jerome Glisse" <j.glisse@gmail.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Lewycky, Andrew" <Andrew.Lewycky@amd.com>,
	"Daenzer, Michel" <Michel.Daenzer@amd.com>,
	"Goz, Ben" <Ben.Goz@amd.com>,
	"Skidanov, Alexey" <Alexey.Skidanov@amd.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Sellek, Tom" <Tom.Sellek@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 00/25] AMDKFD kernel driver
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:39:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D89D60253BB73A4E8C62F9FD18A939CA01066B4D@storexdag02.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53CF5E78.8070208@vodafone.de>



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christian König [mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 3:04 AM
>To: Gabbay, Oded; Jerome Glisse; David Airlie; Alex Deucher; Andrew
>Morton; Bridgman, John; Joerg Roedel; Lewycky, Andrew; Daenzer, Michel;
>Goz, Ben; Skidanov, Alexey; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-
>devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-mm; Sellek, Tom
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] AMDKFD kernel driver
>
>Am 23.07.2014 08:50, schrieb Oded Gabbay:
>> On 22/07/14 14:15, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:52:43PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>>>> On 22/07/14 12:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Oded Gabbay
><oded.gabbay@amd.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Exactly, just prevent userspace from submitting more. And if you
>>>>>>> have misbehaving userspace that submits too much, reset the gpu
>>>>>>> and tell it that you're sorry but won't schedule any more work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure how you intend to know if a userspace misbehaves or
>>>>>> not. Can you elaborate ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well that's mostly policy, currently in i915 we only have a check
>>>>> for hangs, and if userspace hangs a bit too often then we stop it.
>>>>> I guess you can do that with the queue unmapping you've describe in
>>>>> reply to Jerome's mail.
>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>
>>>> What do you mean by hang ? Like the tdr mechanism in Windows (checks
>>>> if a gpu job takes more than 2 seconds, I think, and if so,
>>>> terminates the job).
>>>
>>> Essentially yes. But we also have some hw features to kill jobs
>>> quicker, e.g. for media workloads.
>>> -Daniel
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, so this is what I'm talking about when I say that you and Jerome
>> come from a graphics POV and amdkfd come from a compute POV, no
>> offense intended.
>>
>> For compute jobs, we simply can't use this logic to terminate jobs.
>> Graphics are mostly Real-Time while compute jobs can take from a few
>> ms to a few hours!!! And I'm not talking about an entire application
>> runtime but on a single submission of jobs by the userspace app. We
>> have tests with jobs that take between 20-30 minutes to complete. In
>> theory, we can even imagine a compute job which takes 1 or 2 days (on
>> larger APUs).
>>
>> Now, I understand the question of how do we prevent the compute job
>> from monopolizing the GPU, and internally here we have some ideas that
>> we will probably share in the next few days, but my point is that I
>> don't think we can terminate a compute job because it is running for
>> more than x seconds. It is like you would terminate a CPU process
>> which runs more than x seconds.
>
>Yeah that's why one of the first things I've did was making the timeout
>configurable in the radeon module.
>
>But it doesn't necessary needs be a timeout, we should also kill a running job
>submission if the CPU process associated with the job is killed.
>
>> I think this is a *very* important discussion (detecting a misbehaved
>> compute process) and I would like to continue it, but I don't think
>> moving the job submission from userspace control to kernel control
>> will solve this core problem.
>
>We need to get this topic solved, otherwise the driver won't make it
>upstream. Allowing userpsace to monopolizing resources either memory,
>CPU or GPU time or special things like counters etc... is a strict no go for a
>kernel module.
>
>I agree that moving the job submission from userpsace to kernel wouldn't
>solve this problem. As Daniel and I pointed out now multiple times it's rather
>easily possible to prevent further job submissions from userspace, in the
>worst case by unmapping the doorbell page.
>
>Moving it to an IOCTL would just make it a bit less complicated.

Hi Christian;

HSA uses usermode queues so that programs running on GPU can dispatch work to themselves or to other GPUs with a consistent dispatch mechanism for CPU and GPU code. We could potentially use s_msg and trap every GPU dispatch back through CPU code but that gets slow and ugly very quickly. 

>
>Christian.
>
>>
>>     Oded

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-23 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-17 13:57 Oded Gabbay
2014-07-20 17:46 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21  3:03   ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21  7:01   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21  9:34     ` Christian König
2014-07-21 12:36   ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 13:39     ` Christian König
2014-07-21 14:12       ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 15:54         ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 17:42           ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 18:14             ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 18:36               ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 18:59                 ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 19:23                   ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 19:28                     ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 21:56                       ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 23:05                         ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 23:29                           ` Bridgman, John
2014-07-21 23:36                             ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-22  8:05                           ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22  7:23                     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22  8:10                       ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 15:25       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21 15:58         ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-21 17:05           ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21 17:28             ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 18:22               ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-21 18:41                 ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-21 19:03                   ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-22  7:28                     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22  7:40                       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22  8:21                         ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22  8:19                       ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22  9:21                         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22  9:24                           ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-22  9:52                           ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-22 11:15                             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-23  6:50                               ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-23  7:04                                 ` Christian König
2014-07-23 13:39                                   ` Bridgman, John [this message]
2014-07-23 14:56                                   ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-23 19:49                                     ` Alex Deucher
2014-07-23 20:25                                       ` Jerome Glisse
2014-07-23  7:05                                 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-23  8:35                                   ` Oded Gabbay
2014-07-23 13:33                                   ` Bridgman, John
2014-07-23 14:41                                     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-23 15:06                                       ` Bridgman, John
2014-07-23 15:12                                         ` Bridgman, John

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D89D60253BB73A4E8C62F9FD18A939CA01066B4D@storexdag02.amd.com \
    --to=john.bridgman@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexey.Skidanov@amd.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Lewycky@amd.com \
    --cc=Ben.Goz@amd.com \
    --cc=Michel.Daenzer@amd.com \
    --cc=Oded.Gabbay@amd.com \
    --cc=Tom.Sellek@amd.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=j.glisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox