From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FFEC3F68F for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA68420748 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="NQAQr7m/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AA68420748 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lca.pw Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 16EA88E0005; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:51:12 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 11F1A8E0003; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:51:12 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 00D728E0005; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:51:11 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0031.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.31]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2948E0003 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:51:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 87144180AD801 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:51:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76320129942.11.smile19_61ae250c53a03 X-HE-Tag: smile19_61ae250c53a03 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3449 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com (mail-qt1-f193.google.com [209.85.160.193]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id e12so28822954qto.2 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:51:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DQz0FjxnkcrZB95uhqUPghs+uepx++Cg0e03CfkfPoI=; b=NQAQr7m/F84JH6xZgLELtcSkwP8nDBWDreyVi/HwY6F+R43tc1G6CqQ1ZDu4ZZlufq 3Xb8mxcqIxjSyfjiAkSJ603jB/Iio7i+XeJiG5MjAsV2E7hiLnNEKcLzmeEipmCg1Yut h41C8++kK5khfZ1ScnrCeyJGectHWrMS2ZNrxeyGnLhDoz2k0QtWDU7AydNZctkJI62n NTHF7uI+hScdljY+KOxgYAXbn8rZ8PP83oIIS7vWGV5y1RdsKKMflYrlbo0VevLH+nOX R0H8MB/RhTNYwvUjha/DLBj08zFieM+CNEV1v1ORLVREf2uGTMxN/s/RkqcLp7rJ2eBn 2jJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DQz0FjxnkcrZB95uhqUPghs+uepx++Cg0e03CfkfPoI=; b=EUd3DoTWgRkBd59Ev765GVl8mNYeeH/FvMAMR+B4Nkq4AHkJygEf1MhwYaDRtITYak oCnVOZTLe22LSB0s9jNcHQa35wLxTRlDzbfPXAm0yfaUacgys6XG4hB6yTwDo5CgQbg2 vAM518Tyjsv2IbtZPWhw8YtQFRfdsEV9/GE/+1H4U849pmALczTJREE8jOyiwJqwyIv8 z4QJ92ou0Qq5QWEMeVy0MV8wMYV4CAy0c7fU5CAdDuk5I5iKX+XfexPhTLs6Xo8aOR4R Y5AEOQk5vTWMaVEPCYY9EDItDYrGuHRQ7gbxeG4GFWjEFTBSVIKuBRLXut8O1IMSLnlM ZnnA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtr8jS3pQcp1cDf6mJDtsXFgmZkkRxpvkJeoQDpqTxw3T0a5PE smSUbpt4fDPd6g/G08F8pq8joTsnkhE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwzmOuuJ/FWC8WUTBhMOEyOdQD8LKElXYoAdbbrcMNiJXbkj+74dGHMmtNBqsGrYq3Tk3/Bhg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1109:: with SMTP id c9mr29537417qtj.251.1577670670398; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:51:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.183] (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q126sm12015666qkd.21.2019.12.29.17.51.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:51:09 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Qian Cai Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_owner: print largest memory consumer when OOM panic occurs Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 20:51:08 -0500 Message-Id: References: <1577669436.25204.8.camel@mtkswgap22> Cc: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com In-Reply-To: <1577669436.25204.8.camel@mtkswgap22> To: Miles Chen X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.423154, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > On Dec 29, 2019, at 8:30 PM, Miles Chen wrote: > > Yes, printing top 10 will be too much. That's why I print only the > greatest consumer, and test if this approach works. > > I will resend this patch after the break. Let's wait for others' > comments? Sure, but to make my point clear. Nacked-by: Qian Cai