From: "Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/20] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove per-page mapcount dependency for "mapmax" (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:45:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D80YXDU2A6IE.S4PQYSOT0PYI@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224165603.1434404-19-david@redhat.com>
On Mon Feb 24, 2025 at 11:56 AM EST, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's implement an alternative when per-page mapcounts in large folios are
> no longer maintained -- soon with CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT.
>
> For calculating "mapmax", we now use the average per-page mapcount in
> a large folio instead of the per-page mapcount.
>
> For hugetlb folios and folios that are not partially mapped into MMs,
> there is no change.
>
> Likely, this change will not matter much in practice, and an alternative
> might be to simple remove this stat with CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT.
> However, there might be value to it, so let's keep it like that and
> document the behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst | 5 +++++
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> index 09f0aed5a08ba..1aa190017f796 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst
> @@ -686,6 +686,11 @@ Where:
> node locality page counters (N0 == node0, N1 == node1, ...) and the kernel page
> size, in KB, that is backing the mapping up.
>
> +Note that some kernel configurations do not track the precise number of times
> +a page part of a larger allocation (e.g., THP) is mapped. In these
> +configurations, "mapmax" might corresponds to the average number of mappings
> +per page in such a larger allocation instead.
> +
> 1.2 Kernel data
> ---------------
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 80839bbf9657f..d7ee842367f0f 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -2862,7 +2862,12 @@ static void gather_stats(struct page *page, struct numa_maps *md, int pte_dirty,
> unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> - int count = folio_precise_page_mapcount(folio, page);
> + int count;
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT))
> + count = folio_precise_page_mapcount(folio, page);
> + else
> + count = min_t(int, folio_average_page_mapcount(folio), 1);
s/min/max ?
Otherwise, count is at most 1. Anyway, if you change
folio_average_page_mapcount() as I indicated in patch 16, this
will become count = folio_average_page_mapcount(folio).
>
> md->pages += nr_pages;
> if (pte_dirty || folio_test_dirty(folio))
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 16:55 [PATCH v2 00/20] mm: MM owner tracking for large folios (!hugetlb) + CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] mm: factor out large folio handling from folio_order() into folio_large_order() David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] mm: factor out large folio handling from folio_nr_pages() into folio_large_nr_pages() David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] mm: let _folio_nr_pages overlay memcg_data in first tail page David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] mm: move hugetlb specific things in folio to page[3] David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] mm: move _pincount in folio to page[2] on 32bit David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] mm: move _entire_mapcount " David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] mm/rmap: pass dst_vma to folio_dup_file_rmap_pte() and friends David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] mm/rmap: pass vma to __folio_add_rmap() David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] mm/rmap: abstract large mapcount operations for large folios (!hugetlb) David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] bit_spinlock: __always_inline (un)lock functions David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] mm/rmap: use folio_large_nr_pages() in add/remove functions David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] mm/rmap: basic MM owner tracking for large folios (!hugetlb) David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] mm: Copy-on-Write (COW) reuse support for PTE-mapped THP David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] mm: convert folio_likely_mapped_shared() to folio_maybe_mapped_shared() David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] mm: CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT to prepare for not maintain per-page mapcounts in large folios David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] fs/proc/page: remove per-page mapcount dependency for /proc/kpagecount (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT) David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 20:40 ` Zi Yan
2025-02-24 21:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 21:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 21:10 ` Zi Yan
2025-02-24 21:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 21:23 ` Zi Yan
2025-02-24 21:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 21:44 ` Zi Yan
2025-02-24 21:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove per-page mapcount dependency for PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT) David Hildenbrand
2025-02-25 10:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove per-page mapcount dependency for "mapmax" (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT) David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 20:45 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-02-24 21:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove per-page mapcount dependency for smaps/smaps_rollup (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT) David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 20:53 ` Zi Yan
2025-02-24 21:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] mm: stop maintaining the per-page mapcount of large folios (CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT) David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D80YXDU2A6IE.S4PQYSOT0PYI@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox