From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f199.google.com (mail-io0-f199.google.com [209.85.223.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233046B007E for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:09:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-f199.google.com with SMTP id 5so123203079ioy.2 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:09:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com. [192.55.52.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v7si17751128pae.206.2016.06.16.11.09.06 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:09:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Odzioba, Lukasz" Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] mm/swap.c: flush lru_add pvecs on compound page arrival Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:08:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1465396537-17277-1-git-send-email-lukasz.odzioba@intel.com> <57583A49.30809@intel.com> <20160608160653.GB21838@dhcp22.suse.cz> <575848F9.2060501@intel.com> <20160609122140.GE24777@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20160609122140.GE24777@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko , "Hansen, Dave" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com" , "aarcange@redhat.com" , "vdavydov@parallels.com" , "mingli199x@qq.com" , "minchan@kernel.org" , "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" , "Shutemov, Kirill" On Thru 09-06-16 02:22 PM Michal Hocko wrote: > I agree it would be better to do the same for others as well. Even if > this is not an immediate problem for those. I am not able to find clear reasons why we shouldn't do it for the rest. Ok so what do we do now? I'll send v2 with proposed changes. Then do we still want to have stats on those pvecs? In my opinion it's not worth it now. Thanks, Lukas -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org