From: Christian Theune <ct@flyingcircus.io>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Dao <dqminh@cloudflare.com>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, regressions@leemhuis.info
Subject: Re: Known and unfixed active data loss bug in MM + XFS with large folios since Dec 2021 (any kernel from 6.1 upwards)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:19:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D49C9D27-7523-41C9-8B8D-82B2A7CBE97B@flyingcircus.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgtHDOxi+1uXo8gJcDKO7yjswQr5eMs0cgAB6=mp+yWxw@mail.gmail.com>
> On 19. Sep 2024, at 08:57, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, right now Jens is still going to run some more testing, but I
> think the plan is to just backport
>
> a4864671ca0b ("lib/xarray: introduce a new helper xas_get_order")
> 6758c1128ceb ("mm/filemap: optimize filemap folio adding")
>
> and I think we're at the point where you might as well start testing
> that if you have the cycles for it. Jens is mostly trying to confirm
> the root cause, but even without that, I think you running your load
> with those two changes back-ported is worth it.
>
> (Or even just try running it on plain 6.10 or 6.11, both of which
> already has those commits)
I’ve discussed this with my team and we’re preparing to switch all our
non-prod machines as well as those production machines that have shown
the error before.
This will require a bit of user communication and reboot scheduling.
Our release prep will be able to roll this out starting early next week
and the production machines in question around Sept 30.
We would run with 6.11 as our understanding so far is that running the
most current kernel would generate the most insight and is easier to
work with for you all?
(Generally we run the mostly vanilla LTS that has surpassed x.y.50+ so
we might later downgrade to 6.6 when this is fixed.)
> So considering how well the reproducer works for Jens and Chris, my
> main worry is whether your load might have some _additional_ issue.
>
> Unlikely, but still .. The two commits fix the repproducer, so I think
> the important thing to make sure is that it really fixes the original
> issue too.
>
> And yeah, I'd be surprised if it doesn't, but at the same time I would
> _not_ suggest you try to make your load look more like the case we
> already know gets fixed.
>
> So yes, it will be "weeks of not seeing crashes" until we'd be
> _really_ confident it's all the same thing, but I'd rather still have
> you test that, than test something else than what caused issues
> originally, if you see what I mean.
Agreed, I’m all onboard with that.
Liebe Grüße,
Christian Theune
--
Christian Theune · ct@flyingcircus.io · +49 345 219401 0
Flying Circus Internet Operations GmbH · https://flyingcircus.io
Leipziger Str. 70/71 · 06108 Halle (Saale) · Deutschland
HR Stendal HRB 21169 · Geschäftsführer: Christian Theune, Christian Zagrodnick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-19 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-12 21:18 Christian Theune
2024-09-12 21:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-12 22:11 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-12 22:12 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-12 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-12 22:30 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-12 22:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-13 3:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 13:23 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-13 12:11 ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-16 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 9:51 ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-13 15:30 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-13 15:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 16:33 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-13 18:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-13 21:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-13 16:04 ` David Howells
2024-09-13 16:37 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-16 0:00 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-16 4:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-16 8:47 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-17 9:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-17 9:36 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-17 10:11 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-17 11:13 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-17 13:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 6:37 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-18 9:28 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-18 12:23 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-18 13:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 13:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-18 14:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 14:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-18 17:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 16:37 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-19 1:43 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-19 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 3:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 3:38 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 4:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 4:42 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 4:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-19 4:46 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 5:20 ` Jens Axboe
2024-09-19 4:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-20 13:54 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-24 15:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-24 17:16 ` Sam James
2024-09-25 16:06 ` Kairui Song
2024-09-25 16:42 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-27 14:51 ` Sam James
2024-09-27 14:58 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-01 21:10 ` Kairui Song
2024-09-24 19:17 ` Chris Mason
2024-09-24 19:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 6:34 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-19 6:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-19 10:19 ` Christian Theune [this message]
2024-09-30 17:34 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-30 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-30 19:25 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-30 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-09-30 20:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-30 22:42 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2024-09-30 23:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2024-09-30 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-01 0:56 ` Chris Mason
2024-10-01 7:54 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-10 6:29 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-11 7:27 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-11 9:08 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-11 13:06 ` Chris Mason
2024-10-11 13:50 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-12 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-12-02 10:44 ` Christian Theune
2024-10-01 2:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-16 7:14 ` Christian Theune
2024-09-16 12:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-18 8:31 ` Christian Theune
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D49C9D27-7523-41C9-8B8D-82B2A7CBE97B@flyingcircus.io \
--to=ct@flyingcircus.io \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dqminh@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox