From: Chen Gang <xili_gchen_5257@hotmail.com>
To: "aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"oleg@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"asha.levin@oracle.com" <asha.levin@oracle.com>,
"pfeiner@google.com" <pfeiner@google.com>,
"vishnu.ps@samsung.com" <vishnu.ps@samsung.com>,
Linux Memory <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundant vma looping
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:23:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <COL130-W277AB820846A550742188BB9480@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151004172645.GO19466@redhat.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312", Size: 726 bytes --]
> From: aarcange@redhat.com
>
> Hello Chen,
>
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 12:55:29PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Theoretically, the lock and unlock need to be symmetric, if we have to
>> lock f_mapping all firstly, then lock all anon_vma, probably, we also
>> need to unlock anon_vma all, then unlock all f_mapping.
>
> They don't need to be symmetric because the unlocking order doesn't
> matter. To avoid lock inversion deadlocks it is enough to enforce the
> lock order.
OK, thanks. I shall continue to find another patches. :-)
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
N§²æìr¸zǧu©²Æ {\béì¹»\x1c®&Þ)îÆi¢Ø^nr¶Ý¢j$½§$¢¸\x05¢¹¨è§~'.)îÄÃ,yèm¶ÿÃ\f%{±j+ðèצj)Z·
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-03 19:38 Chen Gang
2015-10-03 20:09 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-10-04 4:55 ` Chen Gang
2015-10-04 17:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-10-05 12:23 ` Chen Gang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=COL130-W277AB820846A550742188BB9480@phx.gbl \
--to=xili_gchen_5257@hotmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vishnu.ps@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox