RE: [PATCH] online CPU before memory failed in pcpu_alloc_pages()

["Guo, Chaohong" <chaohong.guo@intel.com>]

>>
>>  But currently, I don't
>> >think you can use the numa_mem_id()/cpu_to_mem() interfaces for your
>> >purpose.  I suppose you could change page_alloc.c to compile
>> >local_memory_node() #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES) ||
>> >defined
>> >(CPU_HOTPLUG) and use that function to find the nearest memory.  It
>> >should return a valid node after zonelists have been rebuilt.
>> >
>> >Does that make sense?
>>
>> Yes, besides,  I need to find a place in hotplug path to call set_numa_mem()
>> just as you mentioned for ia64 platform.  Is my understanding right ?
>
>I don't think you can use any of the "numa_mem" functions on x86[_64]
>without doing a lot more work to expose memoryless nodes.  On x86_64,
>numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem() always return the same as numa_node_id()
>and cpu_to_node().  This is because x86_64 code hides memoryless nodes
>and reassigns all cpus to nodes with memory.  Are you planning on
>changing this such that memoryless nodes remain on-line with their cpus
>associated with them?  If so, go for it!   If not, then you don't need
>to [can't really, I think] use set_numa_mem()/cpu_to_mem() for your
>purposes.  That's why I suggested you arrange for local_memory_node() to
>be compiled for CPU_HOTPLUG and call that function directly to obtain a
>nearby node from which you can allocate memory during cpu hot plug.  Or,
>I could just completely misunderstand what you propose to do with these
>percpu variables.

Got it, thank you very much for detailed explanation.


-minskey

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>