From: "Guo, Chaohong" <chaohong.guo@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
minskey guo <chaohong_guo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"prarit@redhat.com" <prarit@redhat.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] online CPU before memory failed in pcpu_alloc_pages()
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 12:05:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CF2F38D4AE21BB4CB845318E4C5ECB671E718CC9@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100520134359.fdfb397e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> The operation of "enable CPU to online before memory within a node"
>> fails in some case according to Prarit. The warnings as follows:
>>
>> Pid: 7440, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.32 #2
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff81155985>] pcpu_alloc+0xa05/0xa70
>> [<ffffffff81155a20>] __alloc_percpu+0x10/0x20
>> [<ffffffff81089605>] __create_workqueue_key+0x75/0x280
>> [<ffffffff8110e050>] ? __build_all_zonelists+0x0/0x5d0
>> [<ffffffff810c1eba>] stop_machine_create+0x3a/0xb0
>> [<ffffffff810c1f57>] stop_machine+0x27/0x60
>> [<ffffffff8110f1a0>] build_all_zonelists+0xd0/0x2b0
>> [<ffffffff814c1d12>] cpu_up+0xb3/0xe3
>> [<ffffffff814b3c40>] store_online+0x70/0xa0
>> [<ffffffff81326100>] sysdev_store+0x20/0x30
>> [<ffffffff811d29a5>] sysfs_write_file+0xe5/0x170
>> [<ffffffff81163d28>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1a0
>> [<ffffffff810cfd22>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x252/0x280
>> [<ffffffff81164761>] sys_write+0x51/0x90
>> [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>> Built 4 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 12331603
>> PERCPU: allocation failed, size=128 align=64, failed to populate
>>
>> With "enable CPU to online before memory" patch, when the 1st CPU of
>> an offlined node is being onlined, we build zonelists for that node.
>> If per-cpu area needs to be extended during zonelists building period,
>> alloc_pages_node() will be called. The routine alloc_pages_node() fails
>> on the node in-onlining because the node doesn't have zonelists created
>> yet.
>>
>> To fix this issue, we try to alloc memory from current node.
>
>How serious is this issue? Just a warning? Dead box?
>
>Because if we want to port this fix into 2.6.34.x, we have a little
>problem.
when onlining CPU within a node without local memory , at that time, if
per-cpu-area were used up and failed to be extended, there will be many
warnings about the failure of pcpu_allco(), and at last, an out-of-memory
is triggered and some processes get killed by OOM.
-minskey
>
>
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -714,13 +714,29 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_pages(struct pcpu_chunk
>*chunk,
>
>In linux-next, Tejun has gone and moved pcpu_alloc_pages() into the new
>mm/percpu-vm.c. So either
>
>a) the -stable guys will need to patch a different file or
>
>b) we apply this fix first and muck up Tejun's tree or
>
>c) the bug isn't very serious so none of this applies.
>
>> {
>> const gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_COLD;
>> unsigned int cpu;
>> + int nid;
>> int i;
>>
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> for (i = page_start; i < page_end; i++) {
>> struct page **pagep = &pages[pcpu_page_idx(cpu, i)];
>>
>> - *pagep = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), gfp, 0);
>> + nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * It is allowable to online a CPU within a NUMA
>> + * node which doesn't have onlined local memory.
>> + * In this case, we need to create zonelists for
>> + * that node when cpu is being onlined. If per-cpu
>> + * area needs to be extended at the exact time when
>> + * zonelists of that node is being created, we alloc
>> + * memory from current node.
>> + */
>> + if ((nid == -1) ||
>> + !(node_zonelist(nid, GFP_KERNEL)->_zonerefs->zone))
>> + nid = numa_node_id();
>> +
>> + *pagep = alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp, 0);
>> if (!*pagep) {
>> pcpu_free_pages(chunk, pages, populated,
>> page_start, page_end);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-21 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-18 6:17 minskey guo
2010-05-20 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-21 0:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-21 4:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-21 8:22 ` minskey guo
2010-05-21 8:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-21 9:12 ` minskey guo
2010-05-21 13:21 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-24 1:03 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-24 14:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-25 1:35 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-21 12:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-21 4:05 ` Guo, Chaohong [this message]
2010-05-21 7:29 ` Kleen, Andi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CF2F38D4AE21BB4CB845318E4C5ECB671E718CC9@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=chaohong.guo@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=chaohong_guo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox