From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06190C43603 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB82D21582 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="PywzVWBs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BB82D21582 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lca.pw Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6B4338E0089; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:34:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 665798E0079; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:34:58 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 553868E0089; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:34:58 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0109.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.109]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5EC8E0079 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:34:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E72758249980 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:34:57 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76275031434.02.noise71_8298ba693a139 X-HE-Tag: noise71_8298ba693a139 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3831 Received: from mail-qk1-f195.google.com (mail-qk1-f195.google.com [209.85.222.195]) by imf49.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f195.google.com with SMTP id j9so7621454qkk.1 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:34:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=WIcgHN30dR2crDNHrX3sAimvrkTmgj4IY/+nrOsfb9k=; b=PywzVWBsXibwF9hDhJCdPW2VL32SQKqTUSKd6D+9UIqoIV7pmnlbaOJ+qTm0m1E0uT zFgW0p2F9QnGu1M/DylWPZyV5hnHz7D+ap0nWhNkLi86F7Q3MwF5Kbll87NdUFwBqgWX wXv0O7g9neyrEpeGc6JNk9zpV1O7hOjyaDdTtePzsVisZH/y5QHKU890sIAYZJ9TXJsz Zr/T/HpH6iUXsgmwVIILdLkrupJGp6j8eHGk2ibc3KSXeDV67Lr2jTB05m6geLtaJcXr UuumkHs7gyxZeREiJ/AOjM8DSejbrBZvtPQRT3oVIWlugpNoxcFSHGMhQCfMKr4QF7mE GdWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=WIcgHN30dR2crDNHrX3sAimvrkTmgj4IY/+nrOsfb9k=; b=E1u+NJASh2CwxquZ4ublOT3B4vJm59dhtkw/fbtgUlGLVdUpnc8FKMFAcERj66JtOy RuttEaQZpeE0gwbB+NMMJwqJLdZFlZxW/f1i2YGS/KD4O2XYIg6nZDog12hM/tJG7/C6 wSLf8a8t9wT7U/ETOyB98g1nlGHBBgPn6sTSzi6a23Ra8FXHSudjIF9kVoxO5qc17YU2 KvBkNkD44Q5XnQVPgKvNgcIlEoxr6tNFj2jUvHeHIWJMp/YI0EQARShV8rO/W3zLx4Gl lsmgQ/CvEzYVSng+VUSnWmsYUJa3IwfPfgHaR7xaD5VMUYMgRfv5m9vIBhD9FwpEpmK0 3tlA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWv5YAr70cBin1P9FfTrxpaqz4cMBrbcYTtt3NYgiqzDfbUM8kz ZvTZDbME/BTQpG/v9Rt17t9aJQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvEuSRz1JrJXykeUpICkmJqlku5cTmZZfJ3EItoZnLotOClF6h+hnfPLEg0+oc3Xm2j+KD4A== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e206:: with SMTP id c6mr5684828qkc.105.1576596896651; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.183] (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a66sm7220772qkb.27.2019.12.17.07.34.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:34:56 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Qian Cai Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol.c: move mem_cgroup_id_get_many under CONFIG_MMU Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:34:55 -0500 Message-Id: References: <20191217152814.GB136178@chrisdown.name> Cc: Michal Hocko , Kuninori Morimoto , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20191217152814.GB136178@chrisdown.name> To: Chris Down X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000734, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > On Dec 17, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Chris Down wrote: >=20 > Maybe Qian is right and we should just ignore such patches, but I think th= at comes with its own risks that we will alienate perfectly well intentioned= new contributors to mm without them having any idea why we did that. Yes, that is a good point, but in reality is that there are many subsystems h= ave already done the same. We even have some famous introduction document fo= r kernel development put in the way that if =E2=80=9Cthe maintainers (or Lin= us) ignored your patches after the resend, they probably don=E2=80=99t like i= t.=E2=80=9D=