linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	 akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
	aaron.lu@intel.com,  rppt@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] execmem_alloc for BPF programs
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:30:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW5pq+hzS87Rb3pyoD3z8WH+R7EOAGkTkh-KwEKt9HV_mA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107223921.3451913-1-song@kernel.org>

On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 2:41 PM Song Liu <song@kernel.org> wrote:
>

[...]

>
>
> This set enables bpf programs and bpf dispatchers to share huge pages with
> new API:
>   execmem_alloc()
>   execmem_alloc()
>   execmem_fill()
>
> The idea is similar to Peter's suggestion in [1].
>
> execmem_alloc() manages a set of PMD_SIZE RO+X memory, and allocates these
> memory to its users. execmem_alloc() is used to free memory allocated by
> execmem_alloc(). execmem_fill() is used to update memory allocated by
> execmem_alloc().

Sigh, I just realized this thread made through linux-mm@kvack.org, but got
dropped by bpf@vger.kernel.org, so I guess I will have to resend v3.

Currently, I have got the following action items for v3:
1. Add unify API to allocate text memory to motivation;
2. Update Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.rst;
3. Allow none PMD_SIZE allocation for powerpc.

1 and 2 are relatively simple. We can probably do 3 in a follow up patch
(as I don't have powerpc environments for testing). Did I miss anything?

Besides these, does this set look reasonable? Andrew and Peter, could
you please share your comments on this?

Thanks,
Song

>
> Memory allocated by execmem_alloc() is RO+X, so this doesnot violate W^X.
> The caller has to update the content with text_poke like mechanism.
> Specifically, execmem_fill() is provided to update memory allocated by
> execmem_alloc(). execmem_fill() also makes sure the update stays in the
> boundary of one chunk allocated by execmem_alloc(). Please refer to patch
> 1/5 for more details of
>
> Patch 3/5 uses these new APIs in bpf program and bpf dispatcher.
>
> Patch 4/5 and 5/5 allows static kernel text (_stext to _etext) to share
> PMD_SIZE pages with dynamic kernel text on x86_64. This is achieved by
> allocating PMD_SIZE pages to roundup(_etext, PMD_SIZE), and then use
> _etext to roundup(_etext, PMD_SIZE) for dynamic kernel text.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Ys6cWUMHO8XwyYgr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/
> [2] RFC v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220818224218.2399791-3-song@kernel.org/T/
> [3] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221031222541.1773452-1-song@kernel.org/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Y2ioTodn+mBXdIqp@ziqianlu-desk2/
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220707223546.4124919-1-song@kernel.org/
>
> Changes PATCH v1 => v2:
> 1. Rename the APIs as execmem_* (Christoph Hellwig)
> 2. Add more information about the motivation of this work (and follow up
>    works in for kernel modules, various trampolines, etc).
>    (Luis Chamberlain, Rick Edgecombe, Mike Rapoport, Aaron Lu)
> 3. Include expermential results from previous bpf_prog_pack and the
>    community. (Aaron Lu, Luis Chamberlain, Rick Edgecombe)
>
> Changes RFC v2 => PATCH v1:
> 1. Add vcopy_exec(), which updates memory allocated by vmalloc_exec(). It
>    also ensures vcopy_exec() is only used to update memory from one single
>    vmalloc_exec() call. (Christoph Hellwig)
> 2. Add arch_vcopy_exec() and arch_invalidate_exec() as wrapper for the
>    text_poke() like logic.
> 3. Drop changes for kernel modules and focus on BPF side changes.
>
> Changes RFC v1 => RFC v2:
> 1. Major rewrite of the logic of vmalloc_exec and vfree_exec. They now
>    work fine with BPF programs (patch 1, 2, 4). But module side (patch 3)
>    still need some work.
>
> Song Liu (5):
>   vmalloc: introduce execmem_alloc, execmem_free, and execmem_fill
>   x86/alternative: support execmem_alloc() and execmem_free()
>   bpf: use execmem_alloc for bpf program and bpf dispatcher
>   vmalloc: introduce register_text_tail_vm()
>   x86: use register_text_tail_vm
>
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h |   1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c           |  12 +
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c                   |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c             |  23 +-
>  include/linux/bpf.h                     |   3 -
>  include/linux/filter.h                  |   5 -
>  include/linux/vmalloc.h                 |   9 +
>  kernel/bpf/core.c                       | 180 +-----------
>  kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c                 |  11 +-
>  mm/nommu.c                              |  12 +
>  mm/vmalloc.c                            | 354 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  11 files changed, 412 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-07 22:39 Song Liu
2022-11-07 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/5] vmalloc: introduce execmem_alloc, execmem_free, and execmem_fill Song Liu
2022-11-07 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/5] x86/alternative: support execmem_alloc() and execmem_free() Song Liu
2022-11-07 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/5] bpf: use execmem_alloc for bpf program and bpf dispatcher Song Liu
2022-11-07 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] vmalloc: introduce register_text_tail_vm() Song Liu
2022-11-07 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/5] x86: use register_text_tail_vm Song Liu
2022-11-08 19:04   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-08 22:15     ` Song Liu
2022-11-15 17:28       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-07 22:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] execmem_alloc for BPF programs Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-07 23:13   ` Song Liu
2022-11-07 23:39     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-08  0:13       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-08  2:45         ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-08 18:20         ` Song Liu
2022-11-08 18:12       ` Song Liu
2022-11-08 11:27 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-08 12:38   ` Aaron Lu
2022-11-09  6:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09 11:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-08 16:51   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-08 18:50     ` Song Liu
2022-11-09 11:17     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-09 17:04       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-09 17:53         ` Song Liu
2022-11-13 10:34         ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-14 20:30           ` Song Liu
2022-11-15 21:18             ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-15 21:39               ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-16 22:34                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-17  8:50             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-17 18:36               ` Song Liu
2022-11-20 10:41                 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-21 14:52                   ` Song Liu
2022-11-30  9:39                     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-09 17:43       ` Song Liu
2022-11-09 21:23         ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-10  1:50           ` Song Liu
2022-11-13 10:42         ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-14 20:45           ` Song Liu
2022-11-15 20:51             ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-20 10:44             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-08 18:41   ` Song Liu
2022-11-08 19:43     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-08 21:40       ` Song Liu
2022-11-13  9:58     ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-14 20:13       ` Song Liu
2022-11-08 11:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-08 18:47   ` Song Liu
2022-11-08 19:32     ` Christophe Leroy
2022-11-08 11:48 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-15  1:30 ` Song Liu [this message]
2022-11-15 17:34   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-15 21:54     ` Song Liu
2022-11-15 22:14       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-15 22:32         ` Song Liu
2022-11-16  1:20         ` Song Liu
2022-11-16 21:22           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-16 22:03             ` Song Liu
2022-11-15 21:09   ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-15 21:32     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-15 22:48     ` Song Liu
2022-11-16 22:33       ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-16 22:47         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-11-16 23:53           ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-11-17  1:17             ` Song Liu
2022-11-17  9:37         ` Mike Rapoport
2022-11-29 10:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-29 17:26     ` Song Liu
2022-11-29 23:56       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-30 16:18         ` Song Liu
2022-12-01  9:08           ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-01 19:31             ` Song Liu
2022-12-02  1:38               ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-02  8:38                 ` Song Liu
2022-12-02  9:22                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-06 20:25                     ` Song Liu
2022-12-07 15:36                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-07 16:53                         ` Christophe Leroy
2022-12-07 19:29                           ` Song Liu
2022-12-07 21:04                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-07 21:48                             ` Christophe Leroy
2022-12-07 19:26                         ` Song Liu
2022-12-07 20:57                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-07 23:17                             ` Song Liu
2022-12-02 10:46                 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-12-02 17:43                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-01 20:23             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-12-01 22:34               ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-03 14:46                 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-12-03 20:58                   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPhsuW5pq+hzS87Rb3pyoD3z8WH+R7EOAGkTkh-KwEKt9HV_mA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox