From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f71.google.com (mail-oi0-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3006B0273 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:50:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f71.google.com with SMTP id j5-v6so3877083oiw.13 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 07:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id c184-v6sor2614100oih.272.2018.07.04.07.50.16 for (Google Transport Security); Wed, 04 Jul 2018 07:50:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <359fdf0103b61014bf811d88d4ce36bc793d18f2.1530716899.git.yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com> References: <359fdf0103b61014bf811d88d4ce36bc793d18f2.1530716899.git.yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 07:50:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm: add a function to check if page is from NVDIMM pmem. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Zhang Yi Cc: KVM list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-nvdimm , Paolo Bonzini , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , "Zhang, Yu C" , Linux MM , rkrcmar@redhat.com, "Zhang, Yi Z" , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= [ adding Jerome ] On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Zhang Yi wrote: > For device specific memory space, when we move these area of pfn to > memory zone, we will set the page reserved flag at that time, some of > these reserved for device mmio, and some of these are not, such as > NVDIMM pmem. > > Now, we map these dev_dax or fs_dax pages to kvm for DIMM/NVDIMM > backend, since these pages are reserved. the check of > kvm_is_reserved_pfn() misconceives those pages as MMIO. Therefor, we > introduce 2 page map types, MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX/MEMORY_DEVICE_DEV_DAX, > to indentify these pages are from NVDIMM pmem. and let kvm treat these > as normal pages. > > Without this patch, Many operations will be missed due to this > mistreatment to pmem pages. For example, a page may not have chance to > be unpinned for KVM guest(in kvm_release_pfn_clean); not able to be > marked as dirty/accessed(in kvm_set_pfn_dirty/accessed) etc. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu > --- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > index afb2e6e..1365d18 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -140,10 +140,23 @@ __weak void kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct kvm *kvm, > { > } > > +static bool kvm_is_nd_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn) > +{ > + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); > + > + return is_zone_device_page(page) && > + ((page->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX) || > + (page->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_DEV_DAX)); Jerome, might there be any use case to pass MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC memory to a guest vm? > +} > + > bool kvm_is_reserved_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn) > { > - if (pfn_valid(pfn)) > - return PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)); > + struct page *page; > + > + if (pfn_valid(pfn)) { > + page = pfn_to_page(pfn); > + return kvm_is_nd_pfn(pfn) ? false : PageReserved(page); > + } > > return true; > } > -- > 2.7.4 >