From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] mm/sparsemem: pfn_to_page is not valid yet on SPARSEMEM
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:13:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hzkK6Me27_eK0bCkUrD7wBG4OfbofZzx40R--S0fxrvA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200219115042.e8738272455292d3a6a6e498@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:50 AM Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:04:54 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > When we use SPARSEMEM instead of SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, pfn_to_page()
> > doesn't work before sparse_init_one_section() is called. This leads to a
> > crash when hotplug memory:
> >
> > [ 41.839170] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000006400000
> > [ 41.840663] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> > [ 41.841822] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> > [ 41.842970] PGD 0 P4D 0
> > [ 41.843538] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI
> > [ 41.844125] CPU: 3 PID: 221 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Tainted: G W 5.5.0-next-20200205+ #343
> > [ 41.845659] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> > [ 41.846977] Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn
> > [ 41.847904] RIP: 0010:__memset+0x24/0x30
> > [ 41.848660] Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 f9 48 89 d1 83 e2 07 48 c1 e9 03 40 0f b6 f6 48 b8 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 48 0f af c6 <f3> 48 ab 89 d1 f3 aa 4c 89 c8 c3 90 49 89 f9 40 88 f0 48 89 d1 f3
> > [ 41.851836] RSP: 0018:ffffb43ac0373c80 EFLAGS: 00010a87
> > [ 41.852686] RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff8a1518800000 RCX: 0000000000050000
> > [ 41.853824] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000000ff RDI: 0000000006400000
> > [ 41.854967] RBP: 0000000000140000 R08: 0000000000100000 R09: 0000000006400000
> > [ 41.856107] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000
> > [ 41.857255] R13: 0000000000000028 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8a153ffd9280
> > [ 41.858414] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a153ab00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [ 41.859703] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [ 41.860627] CR2: 0000000006400000 CR3: 0000000136fca000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> > [ 41.861716] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > [ 41.862680] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > [ 41.863628] Call Trace:
> > [ 41.863983] sparse_add_section+0x1c9/0x26a
> > [ 41.864570] __add_pages+0xbf/0x150
> > [ 41.865057] add_pages+0x12/0x60
> > [ 41.865489] add_memory_resource+0xc8/0x210
> > [ 41.866017] ? wake_up_q+0xa0/0xa0
> > [ 41.866416] __add_memory+0x62/0xb0
> > [ 41.866825] acpi_memory_device_add+0x13f/0x300
> > [ 41.867410] acpi_bus_attach+0xf6/0x200
> > [ 41.867890] acpi_bus_scan+0x43/0x90
> > [ 41.868448] acpi_device_hotplug+0x275/0x3d0
> > [ 41.868972] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1a/0x30
> > [ 41.869473] process_one_work+0x1a7/0x370
> > [ 41.869953] worker_thread+0x30/0x380
> > [ 41.870396] ? flush_rcu_work+0x30/0x30
> > [ 41.870846] kthread+0x112/0x130
> > [ 41.871236] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
> > [ 41.871770] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> >
> > We should use memmap as it did.
> >
> > Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> This should have included your signed-off-by, as you were on the patch
> delivery path. I have made that change to my copy of the patch - is
> that OK?
>
> I also added a cc:stable. Do we agree this is appropriate?
I see no harm.
> I added Dan's "On x86 the impact is limited to x86_32 builds, or x86_64
> configurations that override the default setting for
> SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP." to the changelog.
Can also add with Mike's sleuthing. "Other memory hotplug archs
(arm64, ia64, and ppc) also default to SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-19 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-19 3:04 Baoquan He
2020-02-19 3:25 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-19 3:46 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-19 8:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-02-19 16:37 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-19 18:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-02-19 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-19 20:13 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2020-02-19 21:45 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-19 23:55 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-20 10:41 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hzkK6Me27_eK0bCkUrD7wBG4OfbofZzx40R--S0fxrvA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox