From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/numa_emulation: Fix uniform size build failure
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:55:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hw1a8+wwTYaQ0G0jWQzBCDaZ8zxYXw6gXtuWBYGX1LeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180705082435.GA29656@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> The calculation of a uniform numa-node size attempted to perform
>> division with a 64-bit diviser leading to the following failure on
>> 32-bit:
>>
>> arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.o: In function `split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform':
>> arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c:239: undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
>>
>> Convert the implementation to do the division in terms of pages and then
>> shift the result back to an absolute physical address.
>>
>> Fixes: 93e738834fcc ("x86/numa_emulation: Introduce uniform split capability")
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> I'm still getting this link failure on 32-bit kernels:
>
> arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.o: In function `split_nodes_size_interleave_uniform.constprop.1':
> numa_emulation.c:(.init.text+0x669): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> Makefile:1005: recipe for target 'vmlinux' failed
>
> config attached.
>
> These numa_emulation changes are a bit of a trainwreck - I'm removing both
> num_emulation commits from -tip for now, could you please resubmit a fixed/tested
> combo version?
>
So I squashed the fix and let the 0day robot chew on it all day with
no reports as of yet. I just recompiled it here and am not seeing the
link failure, can you send me the details of the kernel config + gcc
version that is failing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-06 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-03 21:00 Dan Williams
2018-07-05 8:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-06 2:55 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-07-06 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-06 16:06 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hw1a8+wwTYaQ0G0jWQzBCDaZ8zxYXw6gXtuWBYGX1LeQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox