From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] dax: fix missing writeprotect the pte entry
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:59:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hsMWe1AreVVhGJD-St3FGtGBMeA-BX7XbA_kVX97tw4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220302082718.32268-6-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 12:30 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> Currently dax_mapping_entry_mkclean() fails to clean and write protect
> the pte entry within a DAX PMD entry during an *sync operation. This
> can result in data loss in the following sequence:
>
> 1) process A mmap write to DAX PMD, dirtying PMD radix tree entry and
> making the pmd entry dirty and writeable.
> 2) process B mmap with the @offset (e.g. 4K) and @length (e.g. 4K)
> write to the same file, dirtying PMD radix tree entry (already
> done in 1)) and making the pte entry dirty and writeable.
> 3) fsync, flushing out PMD data and cleaning the radix tree entry. We
> currently fail to mark the pte entry as clean and write protected
> since the vma of process B is not covered in dax_entry_mkclean().
> 4) process B writes to the pte. These don't cause any page faults since
> the pte entry is dirty and writeable. The radix tree entry remains
> clean.
> 5) fsync, which fails to flush the dirty PMD data because the radix tree
> entry was clean.
> 6) crash - dirty data that should have been fsync'd as part of 5) could
> still have been in the processor cache, and is lost.
Excellent description.
>
> Just to use pfn_mkclean_range() to clean the pfns to fix this issue.
So the original motivation for CONFIG_FS_DAX_LIMITED was for archs
that do not have spare PTE bits to indicate pmd_devmap(). So this fix
can only work in the CONFIG_FS_DAX_LIMITED=n case and in that case it
seems you can use the current page_mkclean_one(), right? So perhaps
the fix is to skip patch 3, keep patch 4 and make this patch use
page_mkclean_one() along with this:
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index 7a2b11c0b803..42108adb7a78 100644
--- a/fs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/Kconfig
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ config FS_DAX_PMD
depends on FS_DAX
depends on ZONE_DEVICE
depends on TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+ depends on !FS_DAX_LIMITED
# Selected by DAX drivers that do not expect filesystem DAX to support
# get_user_pages() of DAX mappings. I.e. "limited" indicates no support
...to preclude the pmd conflict in that case?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-02 8:27 [PATCH v4 0/6] Fix some bugs related to ramp and dax Muchun Song
2022-03-02 8:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] mm: rmap: fix cache flush on THP pages Muchun Song
2022-03-10 0:01 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-02 8:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] dax: fix cache flush on PMD-mapped pages Muchun Song
2022-03-10 0:06 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-10 13:48 ` Muchun Song
2022-03-02 8:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] mm: rmap: introduce pfn_mkclean_range() to cleans PTEs Muchun Song
2022-03-10 0:26 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-10 0:40 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-02 8:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] mm: pvmw: add support for walking devmap pages Muchun Song
2022-03-02 8:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] dax: fix missing writeprotect the pte entry Muchun Song
2022-03-10 0:59 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2022-03-11 9:04 ` Muchun Song
2022-03-14 20:50 ` Dan Williams
2022-03-15 7:51 ` Muchun Song
2022-03-02 8:27 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] mm: remove range parameter from follow_invalidate_pte() Muchun Song
2022-03-10 1:02 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hsMWe1AreVVhGJD-St3FGtGBMeA-BX7XbA_kVX97tw4Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=smuchun@gmail.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox