From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] mm/nvdimm: Use correct #defines instead of open coding
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:33:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hTQ8iVPbOmQNHEeT9-Z6-52k4dxexq5mTr-A4cru0OkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mug5biyg.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:32 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:45 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >> <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>
>
> ...
>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> >>> index 37e96811c2fc..c1d9be609322 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> >>> @@ -725,7 +725,8 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
> >>> * when populating the vmemmap. This *should* be equal to
> >>> * PMD_SIZE for most architectures.
> >>> */
> >>> - offset = ALIGN(start + SZ_8K + 64 * npfns, align) - start;
> >>> + offset = ALIGN(start + SZ_8K + sizeof(struct page) * npfns,
> >>
> >> I'd prefer if this was not dynamic and was instead set to the maximum
> >> size of 'struct page' across all archs just to enhance cross-arch
> >> compatibility. I think that answer is '64'.
> >
> >
> > That still doesn't take care of the case where we add new elements to
> > struct page later. If we have struct page size changing across
> > architectures, we should still be ok as long as new size is less than what is
> > stored in pfn superblock? I understand the desire to keep it
> > non-dynamic. But we also need to make sure we don't reserve less space
> > when creating a new namespace on a config that got struct page size >
> > 64?
>
>
> How about
>
> libnvdimm/pfn_dev: Add a build check to make sure we notice when struct page size change
>
> When namespace is created with map device as pmem device, struct page is stored in the
> reserve block area. We need to make sure we account for the right struct page
> size while doing this. Instead of directly depending on sizeof(struct page)
> which can change based on different kernel config option, use the max struct
> page size (64) while calculating the reserve block area. This makes sure pmem
> device can be used across kernels built with different configs.
>
> If the above assumption of max struct page size change, we need to update the
> reserve block allocation space for new namespaces created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
>
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 7 +++++++
>
> modified drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> @@ -722,7 +722,14 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
> * The altmap should be padded out to the block size used
> * when populating the vmemmap. This *should* be equal to
> * PMD_SIZE for most architectures.
> + *
> + * Also make sure size of struct page is less than 64. We
> + * want to make sure we use large enough size here so that
> + * we don't have a dynamic reserve space depending on
> + * struct page size. But we also want to make sure we notice
> + * if we end up adding new elements to struct page.
> */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(64 < sizeof(struct page));
Looks ok to me. There are ongoing heroic efforts to make sure 'struct
page' does not grown beyond the size of cacheline. The fact that
'struct page_ext' is allocated out of line makes it safe to assume
that 'struct page' will not be growing larger in the foreseeable
future.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-19 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-09 7:45 [PATCH v5 0/4] Mark the namespace disabled on pfn superblock mismatch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-09 7:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] nvdimm: Consider probe return -EOPNOTSUPP as success Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-14 4:22 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-15 19:54 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-19 7:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-19 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-09 7:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/nvdimm: Add page size and struct page size to pfn superblock Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-09 7:45 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] mm/nvdimm: Use correct #defines instead of open coding Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-15 21:05 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-19 7:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-19 9:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-08-19 20:33 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-08-09 7:45 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] mm/nvdimm: Pick the right alignment default when creating dax devices Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hTQ8iVPbOmQNHEeT9-Z6-52k4dxexq5mTr-A4cru0OkQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox