From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23E2C4727F for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B04221F0 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="QEiJCmMJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 31B04221F0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7F34A6B0071; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:43:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7A3456B0072; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:43:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 66B066B0073; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:43:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0128.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.128]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4746B0071 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:43:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E3A3634 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:43:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77292477192.26.pump71_4110ab027152 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D5E1804B640 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:43:16 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: pump71_4110ab027152 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5629 Received: from mail-ed1-f67.google.com (mail-ed1-f67.google.com [209.85.208.67]) by imf43.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f67.google.com with SMTP id c8so18021378edv.5 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=63NW9gk7HRpDHGoorZLXSxJtBEzJkCrOurZGFYdeq1s=; b=QEiJCmMJ+abH4jXWF874MeS11eIiKXKE3h+n39sqAGLPIycrn0MxhLfS6Wo+aHjo6o BgjErpz4dkHZ481e5ATkWq93dIaYf6zudSHfhcDNkoV5W8p3tDbaqO0s4spGS+JLBOVL xn4KEw0MJ1HUUzUo1qdlmI3HLQin57sr4yXqNNwLYhvbPhHVBqnKcLDYDRBfUSirJosj 6VaWUYcV9FK1rBmUDtcRLgsOTXJ8dZ55TiXMjedniQ+O9jvUR4qfgY1xDTm4+TC3Ugui fAgPDzIRGT2lufyhiDkf+4OuUSwYygqW1DEk06diJYWny7csi55q33hB6fNRubbxlgJ1 Vk+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=63NW9gk7HRpDHGoorZLXSxJtBEzJkCrOurZGFYdeq1s=; b=AI0wuHI1w+nSKooR9HrQ2mVSwuZeF/d9T38OYjzTiamHeszuZk9gHHynlcoTh7gEW6 hWb5kIdPUbiZ3pZGy3js7tp4p+Dbh7DsVj/wNVJ4+xdnF1eUTkK/oqvtmnREkSfOczxk Wy0NoYxdXxcHQWbj+HsuBdsIUYNoSEBQx1Q3Rx+I/ECJo11EB2CfigRwT1EYksSt8FOK ITi/H8ei016MvPSRACiEG7DFod1YPneNOcbqhhvm0QmMCRK0C+pz4i4SEZjQyeXYSkQz fief0ePh1PysmKpuYAzcGhuIHyNQFitXaHbHyi1kFw8blocQb2KEuSRi2QUqRAcaQeWv lXCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ubLr/hvVHyD5XwWPMJIdFI/EHv48B+/Yq7DpNEyTkNVntwrnK kJnfYWM++wkHgUYxYBZEqeMRBFe0o/Ic/Oo1dzdqqA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEyMjaWBOlTNqZq+aOqsUhRrRJuhmMZTQc6iiISsny0Ld0R8ZOQAu5Co8gVaeeYbMO5GjUCtpLRRG7qTwcHRY= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c511:: with SMTP id o17mr7090354edq.300.1600821793001; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <159643094279.4062302.17779410714418721328.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200821162134.97d551c6fe45b489992841a8@linux-foundation.org> <7d51834a-9544-b2e8-bfba-1c3e2da0e470@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <7d51834a-9544-b2e8-bfba-1c3e2da0e470@redhat.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] device-dax: Support sub-dividing soft-reserved ranges To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Andrew Morton , Ira Weiny , Ard Biesheuvel , Mike Rapoport , Borislav Petkov , Vishal Verma , David Airlie , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Ard Biesheuvel , Joao Martins , Tom Lendacky , Dave Jiang , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jonathan Cameron , Wei Yang , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pavel Tatashin , Peter Zijlstra , Ben Skeggs , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jason Gunthorpe , Jia He , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Paul Mackerras , Brice Goglin , Jeff Moyer , Michael Ellerman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Vetter , Andy Lutomirski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux MM , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ACPI , Maling list - DRI developers , Zhen Lei Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 3:46 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 22.08.20 01:21, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:53:57 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > > > >>> I think I am missing some important pieces. Bear with me. > >> > >> No worries, also bear with me, I'm going to be offline intermittently > >> until at least mid-September. Hopefully Joao and/or Vishal can jump in > >> on this discussion. > > > > Ordinarily I'd prefer a refresh&resend for 2+ week-old series such as > > this. > > > > But given that v4 all applies OK and that Dan has pending outages, I'll > > scoop up this version, even though at least one change has been suggested. > > > > Should I try to fix patch #11 while Dan is away? Because I think at > least two things in there are wrong (and it would have been better to > split that patch into reviewable pieces). Hey David, Back now, I'll take a look. I didn't immediately see a way to meaningfully break up that patch without some dead-code steps in the conversion, but I'll take another run at it.