From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove extra ZONE_DEVICE struct page refcount
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:10:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gVJuWsOtejrKvWgByq=c1niwQOZ0HHYaSo4h6vc-Xw+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914224509.17699-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:45 PM Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> ZONE_DEVICE struct pages have an extra reference count that complicates the
> code for put_page() and several places in the kernel that need to check the
> reference count to see that a page is not being used (gup, compaction,
> migration, etc.). Clean up the code so the reference count doesn't need to
> be treated specially for ZONE_DEVICE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> ---
>
> Matthew Wilcox, Ira Weiny, and others have complained that ZONE_DEVICE
> struct page reference counting is ugly/broken. This is my attempt to
> fix it and it works for the HMM migration self tests.
Can you link to a technical description of what's broken? Or better
yet, summarize that argument in the changelog?
> I'm only sending this out as a RFC since I'm not that familiar with the
> DAX, PMEM, XEN, and other uses of ZONE_DEVICE struct pages allocated
> with devm_memremap_pages() or memremap_pages() but my best reading of
> the code looks like it might be OK. I could use help testing these
> configurations.
Back in the 4.15 days I could not convince myself that some code paths
blindly assumed that pages with refcount==0 were on an lru list. Since
then, struct page has been reorganized to not collide the ->pgmap back
pointer with the ->lru list and there have been other cleanups for
page pinning that might make this incremental cleanup viable.
You also need to fix up ext4_break_layouts() and
xfs_break_dax_layouts() to expect ->_refcount is 0 instead of 1. This
also needs some fstests exposure.
> I have a modified THP migration patch series that applies on top of
> this one and is cleaner since I don't have to add code to handle the
> +1 reference count. The link below is for the earlier v2:
> ("mm/hmm/nouveau: add THP migration to migrate_vma_*")
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200902165830.5367-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com
>
>
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 1 -
> include/linux/memremap.h | 6 +--
> include/linux/mm.h | 39 ---------------
> lib/test_hmm.c | 1 -
> mm/gup.c | 44 -----------------
> mm/memremap.c | 20 ++++----
> mm/migrate.c | 5 --
> mm/swap.c | 66 +++++++++++---------------
> 9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
This diffstat is indeed appealing.
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> index 84e5a2dc8be5..00d97050d7ff 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> @@ -711,7 +711,6 @@ static struct page *kvmppc_uvmem_get_page(unsigned long gpa, struct kvm *kvm)
>
> dpage = pfn_to_page(uvmem_pfn);
> dpage->zone_device_data = pvt;
> - get_page(dpage);
> lock_page(dpage);
> return dpage;
> out_clear:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index a13c6215bba8..2a4bbe01a455 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,6 @@ nouveau_dmem_page_alloc_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - get_page(page);
> lock_page(page);
> return page;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> index 4e9c738f4b31..7dd9802d2612 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> @@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ enum memory_type {
>
> struct dev_pagemap_ops {
> /*
> - * Called once the page refcount reaches 1. (ZONE_DEVICE pages never
> - * reach 0 refcount unless there is a refcount bug. This allows the
> - * device driver to implement its own memory management.)
> + * Called once the page refcount reaches 0. The reference count is
> + * reset to 1 before calling page_free(). This allows the
> + * device driver to implement its own memory management.
I'd clarify the order events / responsibility of the common core
page_free() and the device specific page_free(). At the same time, why
not update drivers to expect that the page is already refcount==0 on
entry? Seems odd to go through all this trouble to make the reference
count appear to be zero to the wider kernel but expect that drivers
get a fake reference on entry to their ->page_free() callbacks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 22:45 Ralph Campbell
2020-09-14 23:10 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2020-09-14 23:53 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-15 16:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-15 16:39 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-16 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 0:29 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-17 0:32 ` Dan Williams
2020-09-16 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 0:35 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-16 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17 0:34 ` Ralph Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4gVJuWsOtejrKvWgByq=c1niwQOZ0HHYaSo4h6vc-Xw+Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox