linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,  nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	 Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	 John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,  Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	 "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove extra ZONE_DEVICE struct page refcount
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:10:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gVJuWsOtejrKvWgByq=c1niwQOZ0HHYaSo4h6vc-Xw+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914224509.17699-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:45 PM Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> ZONE_DEVICE struct pages have an extra reference count that complicates the
> code for put_page() and several places in the kernel that need to check the
> reference count to see that a page is not being used (gup, compaction,
> migration, etc.). Clean up the code so the reference count doesn't need to
> be treated specially for ZONE_DEVICE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
> ---
>
> Matthew Wilcox, Ira Weiny, and others have complained that ZONE_DEVICE
> struct page reference counting is ugly/broken. This is my attempt to
> fix it and it works for the HMM migration self tests.

Can you link to a technical description of what's broken? Or better
yet, summarize that argument in the changelog?

> I'm only sending this out as a RFC since I'm not that familiar with the
> DAX, PMEM, XEN, and other uses of ZONE_DEVICE struct pages allocated
> with devm_memremap_pages() or memremap_pages() but my best reading of
> the code looks like it might be OK. I could use help testing these
> configurations.

Back in the 4.15 days I could not convince myself that some code paths
blindly assumed that pages with refcount==0 were on an lru list. Since
then, struct page has been reorganized to not collide the ->pgmap back
pointer with the ->lru list and there have been other cleanups for
page pinning that might make this incremental cleanup viable.

You also need to fix up ext4_break_layouts() and
xfs_break_dax_layouts() to expect ->_refcount is 0 instead of 1. This
also needs some fstests exposure.

> I have a modified THP migration patch series that applies on top of
> this one and is cleaner since I don't have to add code to handle the
> +1 reference count. The link below is for the earlier v2:
> ("mm/hmm/nouveau: add THP migration to migrate_vma_*")
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200902165830.5367-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com
>
>
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c     |  1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c |  1 -
>  include/linux/memremap.h               |  6 +--
>  include/linux/mm.h                     | 39 ---------------
>  lib/test_hmm.c                         |  1 -
>  mm/gup.c                               | 44 -----------------
>  mm/memremap.c                          | 20 ++++----
>  mm/migrate.c                           |  5 --
>  mm/swap.c                              | 66 +++++++++++---------------
>  9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

This diffstat is indeed appealing.

>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> index 84e5a2dc8be5..00d97050d7ff 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
> @@ -711,7 +711,6 @@ static struct page *kvmppc_uvmem_get_page(unsigned long gpa, struct kvm *kvm)
>
>         dpage = pfn_to_page(uvmem_pfn);
>         dpage->zone_device_data = pvt;
> -       get_page(dpage);
>         lock_page(dpage);
>         return dpage;
>  out_clear:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index a13c6215bba8..2a4bbe01a455 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,6 @@ nouveau_dmem_page_alloc_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
>                         return NULL;
>         }
>
> -       get_page(page);
>         lock_page(page);
>         return page;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
> index 4e9c738f4b31..7dd9802d2612 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
> @@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ enum memory_type {
>
>  struct dev_pagemap_ops {
>         /*
> -        * Called once the page refcount reaches 1.  (ZONE_DEVICE pages never
> -        * reach 0 refcount unless there is a refcount bug. This allows the
> -        * device driver to implement its own memory management.)
> +        * Called once the page refcount reaches 0. The reference count is
> +        * reset to 1 before calling page_free(). This allows the
> +        * device driver to implement its own memory management.

I'd clarify the order events / responsibility of the common core
page_free() and the device specific page_free(). At the same time, why
not update drivers to expect that the page is already refcount==0 on
entry? Seems odd to go through all this trouble to make the reference
count appear to be zero to the wider kernel but expect that drivers
get a fake reference on entry to their ->page_free() callbacks.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-14 22:45 Ralph Campbell
2020-09-14 23:10 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2020-09-14 23:53   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-15 16:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-15 16:39       ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-16  5:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17  0:29           ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-17  0:32             ` Dan Williams
2020-09-16  6:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17  0:35     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-16  6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-17  0:34   ` Ralph Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4gVJuWsOtejrKvWgByq=c1niwQOZ0HHYaSo4h6vc-Xw+Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox