linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 david@redhat.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	jhubbard@nvidia.com, jglisse@redhat.com,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	songmuchun@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/resource: Fix locking in request_free_mem_region
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:56:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPSr9jGNQ+cVMW12CDt3xTT4HJXDkxeqCTv5Gv=y4G-iRKEi=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326012035.3853-1-apopple@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:22 AM Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> request_free_mem_region() is used to find an empty range of physical
> addresses for hotplugging ZONE_DEVICE memory. It does this by iterating
> over the range of possible addresses using region_intersects() to see if
> the range is free.
>
> region_intersects() obtains a read lock before walking the resource tree
> to protect against concurrent changes. However it drops the lock prior
> to returning. This means by the time request_mem_region() is called in
> request_free_mem_region() another thread may have already reserved the
> requested region resulting in unexpected failures and a message in the
> kernel log from hitting this condition:
>
>         /*
>          * mm/hmm.c reserves physical addresses which then
>          * become unavailable to other users.  Conflicts are
>          * not expected.  Warn to aid debugging if encountered.
>          */
>         if (conflict->desc == IORES_DESC_DEVICE_PRIVATE_MEMORY) {
>                 pr_warn("Unaddressable device %s %pR conflicts with %pR",
>                         conflict->name, conflict, res);
>
> To fix this create versions of region_intersects() and
> request_mem_region() that allow the caller to take the appropriate lock
> such that it may be held over the required calls.
>
> Instead of creating another version of devm_request_mem_region() that
> doesn't take the lock open-code it to allow the caller to pre-allocate
> the required memory prior to taking the lock.
>
> Fixes: 0c385190392d8 ("resource: add a not device managed request_free_mem_region variant")
> Fixes: 0092908d16c60 ("mm: factor out a devm_request_free_mem_region helper")
> Fixes: 4ef589dc9b10c ("mm/hmm/devmem: device memory hotplug using ZONE_DEVICE")
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>

+cc my email (songmuchun@bytedance.com).

Hi Alistair,

Thanks for your patch. But there is a deadlock that should be fixed.
Please see the following scenario.

__request_region
    write_lock(&resource_lock)
        request_region_locked
            revoke_iomem
                devmem_is_allowed (arch/x86/mm/init.c)
                    region_intersects
                        read_lock(&resource_lock)   // deadlock


>
> ---
>
> v2:
>  - Added Fixes tag
>
> ---
>  kernel/resource.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 627e61b0c124..2d4652383dd2 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,34 @@ int __weak page_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_is_ram);
>
> +static int __region_intersects(resource_size_t start, size_t size,
> +                              unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc)
> +{
> +       struct resource res;
> +       int type = 0; int other = 0;
> +       struct resource *p;
> +
> +       res.start = start;
> +       res.end = start + size - 1;
> +
> +       for (p = iomem_resource.child; p ; p = p->sibling) {
> +               bool is_type = (((p->flags & flags) == flags) &&
> +                               ((desc == IORES_DESC_NONE) ||
> +                                (desc == p->desc)));
> +
> +               if (resource_overlaps(p, &res))
> +                       is_type ? type++ : other++;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (type == 0)
> +               return REGION_DISJOINT;
> +
> +       if (other == 0)
> +               return REGION_INTERSECTS;
> +
> +       return REGION_MIXED;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * region_intersects() - determine intersection of region with known resources
>   * @start: region start address
> @@ -546,31 +574,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_is_ram);
>  int region_intersects(resource_size_t start, size_t size, unsigned long flags,
>                       unsigned long desc)
>  {
> -       struct resource res;
> -       int type = 0; int other = 0;
> -       struct resource *p;
> -
> -       res.start = start;
> -       res.end = start + size - 1;
> +       int rc;
>
>         read_lock(&resource_lock);
> -       for (p = iomem_resource.child; p ; p = p->sibling) {
> -               bool is_type = (((p->flags & flags) == flags) &&
> -                               ((desc == IORES_DESC_NONE) ||
> -                                (desc == p->desc)));
> -
> -               if (resource_overlaps(p, &res))
> -                       is_type ? type++ : other++;
> -       }
> +       rc = __region_intersects(start, size, flags, desc);
>         read_unlock(&resource_lock);
> -
> -       if (type == 0)
> -               return REGION_DISJOINT;
> -
> -       if (other == 0)
> -               return REGION_INTERSECTS;
> -
> -       return REGION_MIXED;
> +       return rc;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(region_intersects);
>
> @@ -1171,31 +1180,17 @@ struct address_space *iomem_get_mapping(void)
>         return smp_load_acquire(&iomem_inode)->i_mapping;
>  }
>
> -/**
> - * __request_region - create a new busy resource region
> - * @parent: parent resource descriptor
> - * @start: resource start address
> - * @n: resource region size
> - * @name: reserving caller's ID string
> - * @flags: IO resource flags
> - */
> -struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
> -                                  resource_size_t start, resource_size_t n,
> -                                  const char *name, int flags)
> +static bool request_region_locked(struct resource *parent,
> +                                   struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
> +                                   resource_size_t n, const char *name, int flags)
>  {
> -       DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> -       struct resource *res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
>         struct resource *orig_parent = parent;
> -
> -       if (!res)
> -               return NULL;
> +       DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
>
>         res->name = name;
>         res->start = start;
>         res->end = start + n - 1;
>
> -       write_lock(&resource_lock);
> -
>         for (;;) {
>                 struct resource *conflict;
>
> @@ -1230,16 +1225,39 @@ struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *parent,
>                         write_lock(&resource_lock);
>                         continue;
>                 }
> -               /* Uhhuh, that didn't work out.. */
> -               free_resource(res);
> -               res = NULL;
> -               break;
> +               return false;
>         }
> -       write_unlock(&resource_lock);
>
>         if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource)
>                 revoke_iomem(res);

What do you think of the fix below?

+       if (res && orig_parent == &iomem_resource) {
+               write_unlock(&resource_lock);
+               revoke_iomem(res);
+               write_lock(&resource_lock);
+       }

>
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __request_region - create a new busy resource region
> + * @parent: parent resource descriptor
> + * @start: resource start address
> + * @n: resource region size
> + * @name: reserving caller's ID string
> + * @flags: IO resource flags
> + */
> +struct resource *__request_region(struct resource *parent,
> +                                 resource_size_t start, resource_size_t n,
> +                                 const char *name, int flags)
> +{
> +       struct resource *res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +       if (!res)
> +               return NULL;
> +
> +       write_lock(&resource_lock);
> +       if (!request_region_locked(parent, res, start, n, name, flags)) {
> +               /* Uhhuh, that didn't work out.. */
> +               free_resource(res);
> +               res = NULL;
> +       }
> +       write_unlock(&resource_lock);
>         return res;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__request_region);
> @@ -1779,26 +1797,50 @@ static struct resource *__request_free_mem_region(struct device *dev,
>  {
>         resource_size_t end, addr;
>         struct resource *res;
> +       struct region_devres *dr = NULL;
> +
> +       res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!res)
> +               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +       if (dev) {
> +               dr = devres_alloc(devm_region_release, sizeof(struct region_devres),
> +                                 GFP_KERNEL);
> +               if (!dr) {
> +                       free_resource(res);
> +                       return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +               }
> +       }
>
>         size = ALIGN(size, 1UL << PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
>         end = min_t(unsigned long, base->end, (1UL << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1);
>         addr = end - size + 1UL;
>
> +       write_lock(&resource_lock);
>         for (; addr > size && addr >= base->start; addr -= size) {
> -               if (region_intersects(addr, size, 0, IORES_DESC_NONE) !=
> +               if (__region_intersects(addr, size, 0, IORES_DESC_NONE) !=
>                                 REGION_DISJOINT)
>                         continue;
>
> -               if (dev)
> -                       res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, addr, size, name);
> -               else
> -                       res = request_mem_region(addr, size, name);
> -               if (!res)
> -                       return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +               if (!request_region_locked(&iomem_resource, res, addr,
> +                                                  size, name, 0))
> +                       break;
> +
>                 res->desc = IORES_DESC_DEVICE_PRIVATE_MEMORY;
> +               if (dev) {
> +                       dr->parent = &iomem_resource;
> +                       dr->start = addr;
> +                       dr->n = size;
> +                       devres_add(dev, dr);
> +               }
> +
> +               write_unlock(&resource_lock);
>                 return res;
>         }
>
> +       write_unlock(&resource_lock);
> +       free_resource(res);
> +
>         return ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>  }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01  4:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26  1:20 Alistair Popple
2021-03-26  5:15 ` Balbir Singh
2021-03-29  1:55   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-29  5:39     ` Balbir Singh
2021-03-26  8:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-29  1:37   ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-29  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-30  9:13     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-31  6:19       ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31  6:41         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-29  5:42 ` [kernel/resource] cf1e4e12c9: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2021-03-29  7:53   ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01  4:56 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-04-01  5:03   ` [PATCH v2] kernel/resource: Fix locking in request_free_mem_region Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPSr9jGNQ+cVMW12CDt3xTT4HJXDkxeqCTv5Gv=y4G-iRKEi=g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=smuchun@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox