From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238606B0038 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 08:51:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so35310580wic.1 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 05:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dx2si10778969wib.2.2015.08.22.05.51.03 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Aug 2015 05:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so35147781wic.1 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 05:51:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150822100922.GA25039@gmail.com> References: <1439444244-26057-1-git-send-email-ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> <20150813065040.GA17983@gmail.com> <20150813081641.GA14402@gmail.com> <20150813090119.GA10280@arm.com> <20150813112428.GG10280@arm.com> <20150813172310.GK10280@arm.com> <20150822100922.GA25039@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:51:03 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86/KASAN updates for 4.3 From: Andrey Ryabinin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , "x86@kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , David Keitel , Alexander Potapenko , Andrew Morton , Dmitry Vyukov , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexey Klimov , Yury , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" 2015-08-22 13:09 GMT+03:00 Ingo Molnar : > > * Will Deacon wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:02:26PM +0100, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> > > 2015-08-13 12:01 GMT+03:00 Will Deacon : >> > > > Yes please, works for me! If we're targetting 4.3, then please can you base >> > > > on 4.2-rc4, as that's what our current arm64 queue is using? >> > > > >> > > >> > > Does this mean that we are targeting arm64 part for 4.3 too? >> > >> > It depends on how well it merges with our current queue and whether it >> > holds up to regression testing. The patches have been reviewed, so I'm >> > comfortable with the content, but we're not at a stage where we can debug >> > and fix any failures that might crop up from the merge. >> >> Scratch that :( >> >> I tried this out under EFI and it dies horribly in the stub code because >> we're missing at least one KASAN_SANITIZE_ Makefile entry. >> >> So I think this needs longer to stew before hitting mainline. By all means >> get the x86 dependencies in for 4.3, but the arm64 port can probably use >> another cycle to iron out the bugs. > > Is there any known problem with the two patches in this series, or can I apply > them? > None, as far as I know. BTW, the second patch was Acked-by: Catalin Marinas (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/11/546). I just forgot to add this into changelog. > Thanks, > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org