linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>,
	 Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	 Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	 Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] madvise:madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(): allow split while folio_estimated_sharers = 0
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:35:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOzc2pwZO4xg8TBvt2dpPNT8TeHDnWod6iJh-LJ50hfTn4ua3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221085036.105621-1-21cnbao@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:50 AM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>
> The purpose is stopping splitting large folios whose mapcount are 2 or
> above. Folios whose estimated_shares = 0 should be still perfect and
> even better candidates than estimated_shares = 1.
>
> Consider a pte-mapped large folio with 16 subpages, if we unmap 1-15,
> the current code will split folios and reclaim them while madvise goes
> on this folio; but if we unmap subpage 0, we will keep this folio and
> break. This is weird.
> For pmd-mapped large folios, we can still use "= 1" as the condition
> as anyway we have the entire map for it. So this patch doesn't change
> the condition for pmd-mapped large folios.
> This also explains why we had been using "= 1" for both pmd-mapped and
> pte-mapped large folios before commit 07e8c82b5eff ("madvise: convert
> madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range() to use folios"), because in the
> past, we used the mapcount of the specific subpage, since the subpage
> had pte present, its mapcount wouldn't be 0.
> The problem can be quite easily reproduced by writing a small program,
> unmapping the first subpage of a pte-mapped large folio vs. unmapping
> anyone other than the first subpage.
>
> Fixes: 2f406263e3e9 ("madvise:madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(): don't use mapcount() against large folio for sharing check")
> Cc: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>

Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>

> ---
>  mm/madvise.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index cfa5e7288261..abde3edb04f0 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int madvise_cold_or_pageout_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
>                 if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
>                         int err;
>
> -                       if (folio_estimated_sharers(folio) != 1)
> +                       if (folio_estimated_sharers(folio) > 1)
>                                 break;
>                         if (pageout_anon_only_filter && !folio_test_anon(folio))
>                                 break;
> --
> 2.34.1
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21  8:50 Barry Song
2024-02-21  9:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-21  9:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-21 17:35 ` Vishal Moola [this message]
2024-02-26 13:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-02-26 13:50   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-26 21:17   ` Barry Song
2024-02-27  9:10     ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOzc2pwZO4xg8TBvt2dpPNT8TeHDnWod6iJh-LJ50hfTn4ua3A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox