From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua0-f198.google.com (mail-ua0-f198.google.com [209.85.217.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1780C6B0005 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 17:27:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ua0-f198.google.com with SMTP id g35so4463785uah.7 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id p39sor1801226uaf.28.2018.04.12.14.27.33 for (Google Transport Security); Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:27:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180412212203.GD18364@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20180313132639.17387-1-willy@infradead.org> <20180313132639.17387-8-willy@infradead.org> <20180412211036.GB18364@bombadil.infradead.org> <20180412212203.GD18364@bombadil.infradead.org> From: Ross Zwisler Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:27:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/61] xarray: Add the xa_lock to the radix_tree_root Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , LKML , Linux MM , linux-fsdevel , Ryusuke Konishi , linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote= : > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 03:16:23PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Matthew Wilcox wr= ote: >> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:59:32PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: >> >> This is causing build breakage in the radix tree test suite in the >> >> current linux/master: >> >> >> >> ./linux/../../../../include/linux/idr.h: In function =E2=80=98idr_ini= t_base=E2=80=99: >> >> ./linux/../../../../include/linux/radix-tree.h:129:2: warning: >> >> implicit declaration of function =E2=80=98spin_lock_init=E2=80=99; di= d you mean >> >> =E2=80=98spinlock_t=E2=80=99? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> > >> > Argh. That was added two patches later in >> > "xarray: Add definition of struct xarray": >> > >> > diff --git a/tools/include/linux/spinlock.h b/tools/include/linux/spin= lock.h >> > index b21b586b9854..4ec4d2cbe27a 100644 >> > --- a/tools/include/linux/spinlock.h >> > +++ b/tools/include/linux/spinlock.h >> > @@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ >> > #include >> > >> > #define spinlock_t pthread_mutex_t >> > -#define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) pthread_mutex_t x =3D PTHREAD_MUTEX_IN= ITIALIZER; >> > +#define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) pthread_mutex_t x =3D PTHREAD_MUTEX_IN= ITIALIZER >> > #define __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) (pthread_mutex_t)PTHREAD_MUTEX= _INITIALIZER >> > +#define spin_lock_init(x) pthread_mutex_init(x, NULL) >> > >> > #define spin_lock_irqsave(x, f) (void)f, pthread_mutex= _lock(x) >> > #define spin_unlock_irqrestore(x, f) (void)f, pthread_mutex_unlock(= x) >> > >> > I didn't pick up that it was needed this early on in the patch series. >> >> Hmmm..I don't know if it's a patch ordering issue, because this >> happens with the current linux/master where presumably all the patches >> are present? > > No, Andrew only merged the first 8 or so because of lack of review of > the remaining patches. Even though I cc'd people as hard as I could. > Including you. :-P > > You could, for example, review the DAX patches ... Fair enough. Let's get the radix tree working, and in the mean time I'll throw it into my xfstests testing setup & take a look at the DAX patches.