linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	 Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
	xingwei lee <xrivendell7@gmail.com>,
	 yue sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/memfd_secret: add vmsplice() test
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:10:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKdKaYua48K5F2xD68cFCoiGZSxcYdqgVXrdYTocey2pTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240326143210.291116-3-david@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 3:32 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Let's add a simple reproducer for a scenario where GUP-fast could succeed
> on secretmem folios, making vmsplice() succeed instead of failing. The
> reproducer is based on a reproducer [1] by Miklos Szeredi.
>
> We want to perform two tests: vmsplice() when a fresh page was just
> faulted in, and vmsplice() on an existing page after munmap() that
> would drain certain LRU caches/batches in the kernel.
>
> In an ideal world, we could use fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) /
> MADV_REMOVE to remove any existing page. As that is currently not
> possible, run the test before any other tests that would allocate memory
> in the secretmem fd.
>
> Perform the ftruncate() only once, and check the return value.
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJfpegt3UCsMmxd0taOY11Uaw5U=eS1fE5dn0wZX3HF0oy8-oQ@mail.gmail.com
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
> index 9b298f6a04b3..9a0597310a76 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
>
>  #include "../kselftest.h"
>
> @@ -83,6 +84,45 @@ static void test_mlock_limit(int fd)
>         pass("mlock limit is respected\n");
>  }
>
> +static void test_vmsplice(int fd, const char *desc)
> +{
> +       ssize_t transferred;
> +       struct iovec iov;
> +       int pipefd[2];
> +       char *mem;
> +
> +       if (pipe(pipefd)) {
> +               fail("pipe failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       mem = mmap(NULL, page_size, prot, mode, fd, 0);
> +       if (mem == MAP_FAILED) {
> +               fail("Unable to mmap secret memory\n");
> +               goto close_pipe;
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * vmsplice() may use GUP-fast, which must also fail. Prefault the
> +        * page table, so GUP-fast could find it.
> +        */
> +       memset(mem, PATTERN, page_size);

Shouldn't the non-prefault case be tested as well?

Thanks,
Miklos



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-26 14:32 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm/secretmem: one fix and one refactoring David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/secretmem: fix GUP-fast succeeding on secretmem folios David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 14:56   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-26 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/memfd_secret: add vmsplice() test David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 14:59   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-26 15:10   ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2024-03-26 15:36     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-26 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: merge folio_is_secretmem() and folio_fast_pin_allowed() into gup_fast_folio_allowed() David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOssrKdKaYua48K5F2xD68cFCoiGZSxcYdqgVXrdYTocey2pTg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=samsun1006219@gmail.com \
    --cc=xrivendell7@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox