Re: what protects page lru list?

[Rajesh Ghanekar <rajeshsg@gmail.com>]

Thanks Johannes. It makes sense. I was searching for any code in
which pages is on free list and being operated with lru_lock. But as
you said only pages on LRU lists are operated by lru_lock.

I am facing a panic in __rmqueue at list_del where the struct page
is corrupted or probably the free_list is corrupted. The kernel is
2.6.32.43.xxx from SLES11SP1. I will first see if any of the other code
(proprietary) running is not broken.

- Rajesh

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:11:53AM +0530, Rajesh Ghanekar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>    I am confused with what protects page->lru? Is it both zone->lru_lock or
>> zone->lock? I can see it being protected either by lru_lock or lock.
>
> It's not so much about page->lru but the actual list the page is
> linked to.
>
> The zone's lists of unallocated pages are protected by zone->lock,
> while the LRU lists with the pages for userspace are protected by
> zone->lru_lock.
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>