From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AE6C433DB for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C31C64F1F for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:43:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2C31C64F1F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atishpatra.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7EB218D000B; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:43:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 799AA8D0002; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:43:33 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6AF718D000B; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:43:33 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0080.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.80]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535D58D0002 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:43:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16151AC08 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:43:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77861443506.24.CA2308A Received: from mail-il1-f172.google.com (mail-il1-f172.google.com [209.85.166.172]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE254080F44 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f172.google.com with SMTP id k2so9018279ili.4 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:43:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=atishpatra.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7nQgQdVxzCnygvmyr7XzmI9Y87BNsqr8+LRCIrqPVOU=; b=MfY8kMClqiFIJcCusiF8ttnXu4ZoQYb9jLsnO3mdL64dpXRJGtgXba1m9oXp5iasWZ llQQyWf8ip79oy+Pj8rhXb4khhifyJVfiLDy8BeZYOE+SQgvWW9tP0E0wOrxOIbG+9MM T+mDKl4sBBFqPDEvHjKcwYn68NQM4q5bCcJcU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7nQgQdVxzCnygvmyr7XzmI9Y87BNsqr8+LRCIrqPVOU=; b=pkCSrzC2ebba/30oZbsQ7qGP/MvxWlil4dt3vATEGDhLl6xN92cKPhka3g/YELMtX2 HSbKfK3kl08SMwwQHYN/oyfq00cD96u+wFdWlnnmxJmV6iAg/0MmrySca9Z/bqvIkmOA vwWRBwy0LWOycI1uaux7UnRkn9bmf9BBZ9CwDoaU4Pblo4lAjPM8CLkFIQnMUSbHVHfU BAdRMfuna2dImXwqMYht+gecOPyRsVJqfxzREBR7YGyHm0baSTeNSTW4wJxVzMdteYBV kznkZB2c4E+/UgujPrnY7sKtAcAT867uloVmZgN03SyDJmIGKNPQEFHauRvubxa5opE1 PgRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Jne5kte9eXG3Ee8ezU6yV0YwanokmP7XwwiK2U6wSUiqTJRbF 4SpjAROFblCBe+EUoQ3k97wJH1Skb+5k0IQ6X2hj X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYDv6D5ONb3zbIXZYSGU8bolm9zrWPEHcck1L2SRZ25z6jby4x1ZeeTlXHH7JrXq/FxNNzPA/JGRVShETttw8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1608:: with SMTP id t8mr3784291ilu.79.1614368611817; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:43:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6039178e.nIA6K0eHFcbkwcNB%lkp@intel.com> <20210226111336.91a89c0f5230eae69196f71e@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20210226111336.91a89c0f5230eae69196f71e@linux-foundation.org> From: Atish Patra Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:43:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION d01f2f7e35573049673b71e18be7abfe3f80323f To: Andrew Morton Cc: kernel test robot , Linux Memory Management List , linux-riscv , Albert Ou , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Stat-Signature: be561ybys99jewsuc4mx7ok1n5wezxba X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7AE254080F44 Received-SPF: none (atishpatra.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf02; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail-il1-f172.google.com; client-ip=209.85.166.172 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1614368597-146643 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:13 AM Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:45:18 +0800 kernel test robot wrote: > > > tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > branch HEAD: d01f2f7e35573049673b71e18be7abfe3f80323f Add linux-next specific files for 20210226 > > > > ... > > > > page_alloc.c:(.text+0xe028): undefined reference to `node_reclaim_distance' > > riscv32-linux-ld: page_alloc.c:(.text+0xe02c): undefined reference to `node_reclaim_distance' > > > > ... > > > > |-- riscv-randconfig-p001-20210226 > > | |-- page_alloc.c:(.text):undefined-reference-to-node_reclaim_distance > > | `-- riscv32-linux-ld:page_alloc.c:(.text):undefined-reference-to-node_reclaim_distance > > I assume the riscv randconfig managed to create a .config with > CONFIG_NUMA=n, CONFIG_SMP=y. Configuration doesn't make a lot of > sense, unless someone has a single-CPU machine with cpuless nodes... > > Could the riscv maintainers please test and merge this? > Yeah. This was discussed a week back. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-February/004640.html @Palmer Dabbelt Is the fix merged in the PR ? > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig~a > +++ a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ endchoice > # Common NUMA Features > config NUMA > bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support" > + depends on SMP > select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA > select OF_NUMA > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING > _ > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv -- Regards, Atish