From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84A1E77188 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 06:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 521006B00BC; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 01:48:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4CD998D0001; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 01:48:40 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3473C6B00BF; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 01:48:40 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1315D6B00BC for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 01:48:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA20D16089D for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 06:48:39 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82990613958.19.4319E29 Received: from mail-yb1-f175.google.com (mail-yb1-f175.google.com [209.85.219.175]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE783180010 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 06:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=LhDaisrn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1736491717; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=BbJm1YUYeuUPYzqdaOCLia8KWe57xlNVx83qwQGxv10=; b=AAmaJL6ZDKGPlWAaF4dWD9qHzGagrgkhCpti/Vmn02EIwXCf1yMwfsFzbDkOJuHY7dXtol C98Jql7CdL9kMDji7u0dDak7JrfOnxj+LLUisHVecaaNO7fFeb7Vnn/BrHTCCFxygXuZiX wW8AjbKH/y5CWHm2+fWW/8mKOAV1GXM= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1736491717; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BCPbu7iBvXr/VEyfOZXtAY8pVEyUjukzNDuh1BAOJxVxgXWfAPcwRqMrfAM0TN8xbwUYFG ZXrn5pRNz16vH/m9MKdeqCB6UetBaPExN720CgH2qY2AHTnhFUzWmnAciNdpb83IBrD3Ym oPid5r7CHSSQUI6rhzD/frfsYGy83sg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=LhDaisrn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com Received: by mail-yb1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e53a5ff2233so3121829276.3 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:48:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1736491717; x=1737096517; darn=kvack.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BbJm1YUYeuUPYzqdaOCLia8KWe57xlNVx83qwQGxv10=; b=LhDaisrn/v6KV4act3YfzPg06XO9EEovq6BL1GjmjG/mmfW6pGz2Ze3paMe87O11SJ ngbyX2G9n9GV7PPgHrJTuvgNGS27tihxgt1NQJVCVJyaaqp+f31sVDoO14Bkx9DMN0Lr cHCp4n/JaHDV0c2Y+uqKsnFicbeEI+XYbn0B2EyozLR4uCjBV3qf/JqY5OtdjwTPd1O9 gMMt1SYuLiTS93R99Ar1CoZ+KC3Bpcsjpsb9SytVlGXlsOirxpgaTVDlSWtzksYFLSYa V/031A2gbLuY5bg5vu5DLmDbJl8MoEhOIcpp6sgx3qO6n6dfMqOBvcxsXWKfDWI74XFA dZrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736491717; x=1737096517; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BbJm1YUYeuUPYzqdaOCLia8KWe57xlNVx83qwQGxv10=; b=CrjiliKcrv52tFbCmbN9R0pUTuc8sy/eOHiE+SzIWfg/mNXy1SOOxV+hFUCf+dDxxe JD7SLGOJvMxZYAMr2I9lIn16FLeb0JOKj+TfYIJnNCEPJxB4JScH6xzE9/vvQo0fXbYu Lqh5HuHWyDlkM7i+fbI+gvuaVnTGyStY3Id7ItSWWJeGMDFrlSAZuQOMc1FxNkfQACds Y3vJrPa54TCY78hqPPa0f6Se4VNA9ytNszNudPWKD4slNteKPBDDWaFXcj/GzrMAiTiV MU/bhx2H5WW8BTBsIAgKwj/LAXX+fvMy8rUeiBAnnmI06Mp2RCDNN9/+nkDWpL1lp8Cs J8pA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXPf3OKGpELZgz0UX7D8YjtzueDk8/joj5zVdd4511Le2qUmrUBFnQWaISRtp/vHNURU0Vb7Qy42Q==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxMGUemS1abS7TS3TZc83vHhDt/y/yLiTPo1CzfOlil48FLEewU 9nuAvhW8jP+l0UEcTTQvqF1PQh2MhHjOQRwzD5W8csQuooWhdyfDerFisLcHerKpbbMXfK8jRUa j+fchhRtKmWe4kNWIYrn11o8C2ko= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsBVxyinZqG0MIDyKFCTiuMloF0Hdqh6Xhg5gGHZFRbAVDGKU8Ts4vV2/0u4V8 tvBbQYcFrpKYVEioCqxG2Yd3tad96j4Vb8hgKZqs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGWXh/MZ6OXMOZxjgr1jv4Tphc4pG+hTilGnQ5B3eHrVZ2tKRbsePGN7HMxnFkj7u0GP9IviYajQw5Q6zQpv3g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:727:b0:e54:9bab:d934 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e54ee1775ecmr7381031276.31.1736491716865; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 22:48:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250109033136.2845676-1-guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com> <20250109164315.b21f40e1b757b1cf9eb7e042@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20250109164315.b21f40e1b757b1cf9eb7e042@linux-foundation.org> From: Weikang Guo Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:01 +0800 X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvakAeyXiDA4OXYW9dxia14hVayNOKp7iil0a924Byt1H8En7eSIg4izf7c Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/s390: save_area_alloc default failure behavior changed to panic To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alexander Gordeev , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Stat-Signature: 4wh651df6zifuotj1uqkr11mgwkhjbr6 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DE783180010 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-HE-Tag: 1736491717-160096 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19isbPLRXTzOX9YLQY45N3DS6g2jhHRN4Sttk3CfiNQRl5Ub47xwLtKRG00u5ZeRQuvU0J6bG1AbZZZeeXaP1WvsIqUaaGSiGjD4gReprCt4gGX6lJeQoZDTnc9Z7nt7K/mOk+UAjrvosUgd4JVkSXhHOqgpGmcGjlbqpbjtlv4oTwiRxFfIbypntqzubZxLrspr+s5DRX+pSavbwkVIrL/zZfRkKkt1tBbgCFYArJO19njBF/hK5C2TfW2yrziUj8+dshMu4SEJ0L/cVVFw5kkb6egvxB/tb3sqOS54UuyxmhJqRypEwDP+0SoiX9qGqnfWHZVERARUPU3YtkpAGOIhWuGRcBtGsfxwyznG3kpRY4K8A3k0861pyH+rgZ3mGvlxUVE6O2KUo4OvOzZCym6zrXJl0TCNbmuZ4qq5de/qs2DjVX1yrpf76VNS9QqmABEewHERe6anBce4WNXMjJAj3YU+bSHpfiQmP609iFZOXjCQcCosSYXMI9FPYUjE3/ZsS26XQRF1cGVQXvxeIY0y9o3U5vagTlLhz2czfUWaDt63rB5OuzlydrqlqGn2IvIA3dv5rCGbsdsL3Yw9+7cfyM4YTkjfwBKoGZn42pbf2/7F+A11Ece7qpnIcmNoMj8jY98DT0IYwWXmotxjm0RkHBuM07HTsjupEm/XtKYzq0x1VN1IYMGEV9Zsp+n7b+3y7H8ZWIns6Xh4j/JdvePwr7anj0G8EkjEgSaZeGXk3vZcTalxWvniEAaw/BqTODH3a1fN0poQc/626tKgKbjW/Dj5ywygYdOTTgByNvQvBFjpb+KIV/SX2efsqa5j+dRW0HJEYbYwNQ+c9heRIToRdwAauYXkFi6khAnIVJr4Qztgm8OFknShL5Sdgxua1jZszDdVO14sVyjVg9rzfhU+JowRQNFe4du9kJb1KuP6cbvKNmAskSbxAJ0CkXkGPYX5q4v0mY yVZDEZoT 1SCt2DsF2D//SJDzS6HFx0JcNrLjToWOz8TlVTgTuX4/tiSEqrjfhLVCJ/BlBzVWS6Vrv1BVaTlEGIX0BqbScxXl/D0/kw+pExfCnsYs3r5bh5IIhYF99RsmxM6Skc4JMmSeogIvQoxBpC+Ko9s2akAf82iiBrhVnNrk7UCjT29FCZsQs4bPJhHJ3Ce7RG2Z3joVuTbddOPxhBR9BPpiKhJyUXFQDccM4AiA5MxHNhOLHcHqB2EnO2BuuCt+yT7aa5oC+PFCd9BGKYVqXGZZ1YauO9Rj1IEmf8JT88wBGOs/LZw4zoCVs6XZ/xOuQOB/IhbM5kjwpWX9tAKCpnZ38PuItdtLm9GtYudMpVhNtT3y20QDKlFibZBWad5DvLlolrs0vreRCDhFhc2sgXjZo8gjx/95NlNxdTkARWef3DsrEjYXXYXebHOMelo+CO7nX0IHqZyyk8jGw6twowMAKPPtSDA== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000002, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Andrew Morton wrote on Friday, 10 January 2025 08:43: > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:53:57 +0800 Weikang Guo wrote: > > > I understand your point, you want to modify directly based on the > > original patch. > > If we repost it,it may not be v8 but v9. > > > > Last v8 patch: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250102072528.650926-1-guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com > > > > I reduced the recipients for V8 because I remembered that the number > > of CCs might > > have exceeded the limit at the time, and there hadn't been any > > comments on V7 for a long time > > > > > @Andrew, is that still possible? > > > > @Andrew, I can cooperate if necessary, I could merge them into one > > patch and repost. > > I'll fold this patch ("arch/s390: save_area_alloc default failure > behavior changed to panic") into > "mm-memblock-add-memblock_alloc_or_panic-interface.patch", v8 before > sending the latter upstream. > Andrew, I appreciate your help with this! > But I'm not sure that we've completed the review discussion of > "mm/memblock: add memblock_alloc_or_panic interface" with Mike? Here is Mike's latest feedback on the patch, I have recorded it in the v8 changelog: Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) Links: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z2fknmnNtiZbCc7x@kernel.org/ Thanks! --- Guo