linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
	david@redhat.com,  ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle large folio
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 18:35:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOUHufZHyEvU-c2O6B6stM_QVMxc22zV4Szn52myYqjdZvptUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40cbc39e-5179-c2f4-3cea-0a98395aaff1@intel.com>

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 6:00 PM Yin, Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/15/2023 2:06 PM, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > There is a problem here that I didn't have the time to elaborate: we
> > can't mlock() a folio that is within the range but not fully mapped
> > because this folio can be on the deferred split queue. When the split
> > happens, those unmapped folios (not mapped by this vma but are mapped
> > into other vmas) will be stranded on the unevictable lru.
>
> This should be fine unless I missed something. During large folio split,
> the unmap_folio() will be migrate(anon)/unmap(file) folio. Folio will be
> munlocked in unmap_folio(). So the head/tail pages will be evictable always.

It's close but not entirely accurate: munlock can fail on isolated folios.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-17  0:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-12  6:01 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] support large folio for mlock Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm: add functions folio_in_range() and folio_within_vma() Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:11   ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-12  6:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm: handle large folio when large folio in VM_LOCKED VMA range Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:23   ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-12  6:43     ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12 17:03       ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-13  1:55         ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-14  2:21       ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-14  2:49         ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-14  3:41           ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-14  5:45             ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle large folio Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:31   ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-15  6:06     ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-16 23:59       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-17  0:35         ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2023-07-17  1:58           ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-18 22:48             ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-18 23:47               ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19  1:32                 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  1:52                   ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  1:57                     ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19  2:00                       ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  2:09                         ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19  2:22                           ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  2:28                             ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19 14:26                               ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-19 15:44                                 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-20 12:02                                   ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-20 20:51                                     ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-21  1:12                                       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-21  1:35                                         ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-21  3:18                                           ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-21  3:39                                             ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-20  1:52                                 ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-17  8:12           ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-18  2:06             ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-18  3:59               ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-26 12:49       ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-26 16:57         ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-27  0:15           ` Yin Fengwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOUHufZHyEvU-c2O6B6stM_QVMxc22zV4Szn52myYqjdZvptUA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox