Re: [page-reclaim] Re: [GIT PULL] Multi-gen LRU for 5.18-rc1

[Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>]

On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 2:49 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:16:15 -0600 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:00 PM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is more of an option than a request for 5.18. I'm sending it to
> > > > you directly because, in my judgement, it's now as ready as it'll ever
> > > > be.
> > >
> > > So I do expect to merge this, but I don't think it has been in
> > > linux-next, has it?
> >
> > No. I could ask Stephen to see if he is willing to take this series. I
> > was hoping to go through Andrew since his tree is what most MM
> > developers test. I haven't heard from Andrew, so I assume he has no
> > strong opinion and I don't want to put him in a different position.
>
> hm, sorry, something in the headers here fooled my (elaborate) procmail
> rules :(
>
> Please yes, let's have a cycle in -next.  I thought we decided to do
> that in discussion with Matthew Wilcox?

Will do.

> Also, sorry, but I'm not seeing many commonly-seen names amongst the
> reviewers.  I'd be more comfortable if people who have done most work on
> page reclaim up to this time have had time to review and comment.

Me too :) Unfortunately I can't dictate others' priorities or
methodologies. So I have reset my expectations from getting their
reviewed-by's to not getting their NAKs.