linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: oliver <oohall@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/init: fix zone boundary creation
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:18:03 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOSf1CGCMxExXztXZ233DTDSEVbrd7Kj7U4JRY_rP2KFmXtY5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160530091504.GN2527@techsingularity.net>

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 02:21:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu,  5 May 2016 17:57:13 +1000 "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > As a part of memory initialisation the architecture passes an array to
>> > free_area_init_nodes() which specifies the max PFN of each memory zone.
>> > This array is not necessarily monotonic (due to unused zones) so this
>> > array is parsed to build monotonic lists of the min and max PFN for
>> > each zone. ZONE_MOVABLE is special cased here as its limits are managed by
>> > the mm subsystem rather than the architecture. Unfortunately, this special
>> > casing is broken when ZONE_MOVABLE is the not the last zone in the zone
>> > list. The core of the issue is:
>> >
>> >     if (i == ZONE_MOVABLE)
>> >             continue;
>> >     arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[i] =
>> >             arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[i-1];
>> >
>> > As ZONE_MOVABLE is skipped the lowest_possible_pfn of the next zone
>> > will be set to zero. This patch fixes this bug by adding explicitly
>> > tracking where the next zone should start rather than relying on the
>> > contents arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[].
>>
>> hm, this is all ten year old Mel code.
>>
>
> ZONE_MOVABLE at the time always existed at the end of a node during
> initialisation time. It was allowed because the memory was always "stolen"
> from the end of the node where it could have the same limitations as
> ZONE_HIGHMEM if necessary. It was also safe to assume that zones never
> overlapped as zones were about addressing limitations. If ZONE_CMA or
> ZONE_DEVICE can overlap with other zones during initialisation time then
> there may be a few gremlins hiding in there. Unfortunately I have not
> done an audit searching for problems with overlapping zones.

I think it's still reasonable to assume there is no overlap in early init. The
interface to free_area_init_nodes() ensures that zones are disjoint and as far
as I can tell the only way to get an overlapping zone at that point is to hit
the bug this patch fixes. ZONE_CMA is only populated when core_initcall()s are
processed and ZONE_DEVICE is hotplugged by drivers so it should appear even
later.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-30 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05  7:57 Oliver O'Halloran
2016-05-26 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2016-05-27  8:03   ` oliver
2016-05-30  9:15   ` Mel Gorman
2016-05-30 13:18     ` oliver [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOSf1CGCMxExXztXZ233DTDSEVbrd7Kj7U4JRY_rP2KFmXtY5g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox