From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: doing lots of disk writes causes oom killer to kill processes
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 12:12:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOMqctQ+XchmXk_Xno6ViAoZF-tHFPpDWoy7LVW1nooa+ywbmg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMqctQyS2SFraqJpzE0sRFcihFpMHRhT+3QuZhxft=SUXYVDw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello
On 26 August 2013 15:51, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 March 2013 03:15, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On 11 March 2013 13:15, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On 8 February 2013 17:31, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am dealing with VM disk images and performing something like wiping
>>>> free space to prepare image for compressing and storing on server or
>>>> copying it to external USB disk causes
>>>>
>>>> 1) system lockup in order of a few tens of seconds when all CPU cores
>>>> are 100% used by system and the machine is basicaly unusable
>>>>
>>>> 2) oom killer killing processes
>>>>
>>>> This all on system with 8G ram so there should be plenty space to work with.
>>>>
>>>> This happens with kernels 3.6.4 or 3.7.1
>>>>
>>>> With earlier kernel versions (some 3.0 or 3.2 kernels) this was not a
>>>> problem even with less ram.
>>>>
>>>> I have vm.swappiness = 0 set for a long time already.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I did some testing with 3.7.1 and with swappiness as much as 75 the
>>>kernel still causes all cores to loop somewhere in system when writing
>>>lots of data to disk.
>>>
>>>With swappiness as much as 90 processes still get killed on large disk writes.
>>>
>>>Given that the max is 100 the interval in which mm works at all is
>>>going to be very narrow, less than 10% of the paramater range. This is
>>>a severe regression as is the cpu time consumed by the kernel.
>>>
>>>The io scheduler is the default cfq.
>>>
>>>If you have any idea what to try other than downgrading to an earlier
>>>unaffected kernel I would like to hear.
>>>
>> Can you try commit 3cf23841b4b7(mm/vmscan.c: avoid possible
>> deadlock caused by too_many_isolated())?
>>
>> Or try 3.8 and/or 3.9, additionally?
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> with deadline IO scheduler I experience this issue less often but it
> still happens.
>
> I am on 3.9.6 Debian kernel so 3.8 did not fix this problem.
>
> Do you have some idea what to log so that useful information about the
> lockup is gathered?
>
This appears to be fixed in vanilla 3.11 kernel.
I still get short intermittent lockups and cpu usage spikes up to 20%
on a core but nowhere near the minute+ long lockups with all cores
100% on earlier kernels.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-05 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 2:15 Hillf Danton
2013-03-12 9:03 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-08-26 13:51 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-09-05 10:12 ` Michal Suchanek [this message]
2013-09-17 13:31 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-09-17 21:13 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-17 22:22 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-09-18 14:56 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-09-19 10:13 ` Jan Kara
2013-10-09 14:19 ` Michal Suchanek
2013-10-15 14:15 ` Michal Suchanek
2014-07-07 11:34 ` Michal Suchanek
[not found] ` <CAJd=RBD_6FMHS3Dg_Zqugs4YCHHDeCgrxypANpPP5K2xTLE0bA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-20 11:20 ` Michal Suchanek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-02-08 16:31 Michal Suchanek
2013-03-11 13:15 ` Michal Suchanek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOMqctQ+XchmXk_Xno6ViAoZF-tHFPpDWoy7LVW1nooa+ywbmg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hramrach@gmail.com \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox