From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF6B6B0031 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 05:12:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e9so11673397qcy.20 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:12:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h18si45710819qen.46.2013.12.31.02.12.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:12:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uz6so12668893obc.9 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:12:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <52C2811C.4090907@huawei.com> References: <52C2811C.4090907@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:12:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add a new command-line kmemcheck value From: Vegard Nossum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Xishi Qiu Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Vegard Nossum , Pekka Enberg , Mel Gorman , wangnan0@huawei.com, the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Linux MM (Oops, resend to restore Cc.) Hi, On 31 December 2013 09:32, Xishi Qiu wrote: > Add a new command-line kmemcheck value: kmemcheck=3 (disable the feature), > this is the same effect as CONFIG_KMEMCHECK disabled. > After doing this, we can enable/disable kmemcheck feature in one vmlinux. Could you please explain what exactly the difference is between the existing kmemcheck=0 parameter and the new kmemcheck=3? Thanks, Vegard -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org