From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx114.postini.com [74.125.245.114]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 031226B0044 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 04:03:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by iajr24 with SMTP id r24so5685574iaj.14 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:03:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120430075417.GA8438@lizard> References: <4F9E39F1.5030600@kernel.org> <20120430075417.GA8438@lizard> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:03:23 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vmevent: question? From: Pekka Enberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Anton Vorontsov Cc: Minchan Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar , Leonid Moiseichuk Hi Anton, On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > It seems to be a pretty nice driver. Speaking of ABI, the only thing > I personally dislike is VMEVENT_CONFIG_MAX_ATTRS (i.e. fixed-size > array in vmevent_config)... but I guess it's pretty easy to make > it variable-sized array... was there any particular reason to make > the _MAX thing? It made the implementation simpler but the ABI should support variable-sized arrays. We can relax the limitation if necessary. Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org