From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx163.postini.com [74.125.245.163]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 145C46B005D for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:31:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c4so1043887eek.14 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 03:31:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20121107105348.GA25549@lizard> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:31:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/3] vmpressure_fd: Linux VM pressure notifications From: Pekka Enberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Anton Vorontsov Cc: Mel Gorman , Leonid Moiseichuk , KOSAKI Motohiro , Minchan Kim , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , John Stultz , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, kernel-team@android.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > I love the API and implementation simplifications but I hate the new > ABI. It's a specialized, single-purpose syscall and bunch of procfs > tunables and I don't see how it's 'extensible' to anything but VM s/anything but VM/anything but VM pressure notification/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org