From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx205.postini.com [74.125.245.205]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FB1D6B0005 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:47:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so212182wey.28 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:47:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0000013d02ee5bf7-a2d47cfc-64fb-4faa-b92e-e567aeb6b587-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <1361550000-14173-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <0000013d02d9ee83-9b41b446-ee42-4498-863e-33b3175c007c-000000@email.amazonses.com> <5127A607.3040603@parallels.com> <0000013d02ee5bf7-a2d47cfc-64fb-4faa-b92e-e567aeb6b587-000000@email.amazonses.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:47:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slub: correctly bootstrap boot caches From: Pekka Enberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Glauber Costa , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Joonsoo Kim On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> > Argh. This one was the final version: >> > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/ >> > >> >> It seems it would work. It is all the same to me. >> Which one do you prefer? > > Flushing seems to be simpler and less code. Well, I completely lost track of what to apply... Can someone please send me the final version that everybody agrees on with proper ACKs and other attributions? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org