From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx128.postini.com [74.125.245.128]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A9F06B006C for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 05:40:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3so273399wey.14 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 02:40:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1347977530-29755-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> References: <1347977530-29755-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:40:15 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] slab accounting for memcg From: Pekka Enberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, devel@openvz.org, Tejun Heo , linux-mm@kvack.org, Suleiman Souhlal , Frederic Weisbecker , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes Hi Glauber, On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > This is a followup to the previous kmem series. I divided them logically > so it gets easier for reviewers. But I believe they are ready to be merged > together (although we can do a two-pass merge if people would prefer) > > Throwaway git tree found at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/memcg.git kmemcg-slab > > There are mostly bugfixes since last submission. Overall, I like this series a lot. However, I don't really see this as a v3.7 material because we already have largeish pending updates to the slab allocators. I also haven't seen any performance numbers for this which is a problem. So what I'd really like to see is this series being merged early in the v3.8 development cycle to maximize the number of people eyeballing the code and looking at performance impact. Does this sound reasonable to you Glauber? Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org