From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx192.postini.com [74.125.245.192]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C449D6B00F8 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 02:24:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by vbbey12 with SMTP id ey12so78859vbb.14 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 23:24:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4F6743C2.3090906@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 09:24:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: object allocation benchmark From: Pekka Enberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: Christoph Lameter , Glauber Costa , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Suleiman Souhlal , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:41 PM, David Rientjes wrot= e: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote: > >> I have some in kernel benchmarking tools for page allocator and slab >> allocators. But they are not really clean patches. >> > > This is the latest version of your tools that I have based on 3.3. =A0Loa= d > the modules with insmod and it will produce an error to automatically > unloaded (by design) and check dmesg for the results. Anyone interested in pushing the benchmark to mainline? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org