From: Sebastiaan Meijer <meijersebastiaan@gmail.com>
To: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, buddy.lumpkin@oracle.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@surriel.com,
willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vmscan: Support multiple kswapd threads per node
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:27:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANuy=C+JH7sZbMToWNNyWcKANbwSx5KLaiRBLHXBz6EU=JCABA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
> yes it shows the bottleneck but it is quite artificial. Read data is
> usually processed and/or written back and that changes the picture a
> lot.
Apologies for reviving an ancient thread (and apologies in advance for my lack
of knowledge on how mailing lists work), but I'd like to offer up another
reason why merging this might be a good idea.
From what I understand, zswap runs its compression on the same kswapd thread,
limiting it to a single thread for compression. Given enough processing power,
zswap can get great throughput using heavier compression algorithms like zstd,
but this is currently greatly limited by the lack of threading.
People on other sites have claimed applying this patchset greatly improved
zswap performance on their systems even for lighter compression algorithms.
For me personally I currently have a swap-heavy zswap-enabled server with
a single-threaded kswapd0 consuming 100% CPU constantly, and performance
is suffering because of it.
The server has 32 cores sitting mostly idle that I'd love to put to zswap work.
This setup could be considered a corner case, but it's definitely a
production workload that would greatly benefit from this change.
--
Sebastiaan Meijer
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-30 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-30 19:27 Sebastiaan Meijer [this message]
2020-10-01 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-01 16:18 ` Sebastiaan Meijer
2020-10-02 7:03 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-02 8:40 ` Mel Gorman
2020-10-02 13:53 ` Rik van Riel
2020-10-02 14:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-02 14:29 ` Michal Hocko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-02 9:24 [RFC PATCH 0/1] mm: " Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-02 9:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] vmscan: " Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-03 13:31 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-03 19:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-03 20:49 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-03 21:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-04 10:07 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-05 4:08 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-11 6:37 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-11 3:52 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-03 19:41 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-12 13:16 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-17 3:02 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-17 9:03 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-03 20:13 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-11 3:10 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2018-04-12 13:23 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANuy=C+JH7sZbMToWNNyWcKANbwSx5KLaiRBLHXBz6EU=JCABA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=meijersebastiaan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=buddy.lumpkin@oracle.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox