From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744E16B0038 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:55:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c1so2866160igq.7 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bs7si24875559icc.145.2014.04.22.04.55.03 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y20so5142441ier.27 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:55:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <535631EB.4060906@redhat.com> References: <1395256011-2423-1-git-send-email-dh.herrmann@gmail.com> <5343F2EC.3050508@redhat.com> <535631EB.4060906@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:55:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] File Sealing & memfd_create() From: David Herrmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Florian Weimer Cc: linux-kernel , Kay Sievers , Daniel Mack , Lennart Poettering , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , linux-fsdevel , linux-mm Hi On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Ah. What do you recommend for recipient to recognize such descriptors? > Would they just try to seal them and reject them if this fails? This highly depends on your use-case. Please see the initial email in this thread. It describes 2 example use-cases. In both cases, the recipients read the current set of seals and verify that a given set of seals is set. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org