From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: dvyukov@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] kmsan: merge test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned{,2}() together
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:06:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNP61zOdXR=FYjtzUqcjxg=j_Otqotqv_OTN_Hi2E-LXLg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230911145702.2663753-3-glider@google.com>
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 16:57, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce report_reset() that allows checking for more than one KMSAN
> report per testcase.
> Fold test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2() into
> test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned(), so that they share the setup phase
> and check the behavior of a single memcpy() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> index a8d4ca4a1066d..6eb1e1a4d08f9 100644
> --- a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> +++ b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,17 @@ static bool report_available(void)
> return READ_ONCE(observed.available);
> }
>
> +/* Reset observed.available, so that the test can trigger another report. */
> +static void report_reset(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&observed.lock, flags);
> + WRITE_ONCE(observed.available, false);
> + observed.ignore = false;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&observed.lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> /* Information we expect in a report. */
> struct expect_report {
> const char *error_type; /* Error type. */
> @@ -454,7 +465,7 @@ static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_aligned(struct kunit *test)
> *
> * Copying aligned 4-byte value to an unaligned one leads to touching two
> * aligned 4-byte values. This test case checks that KMSAN correctly reports an
> - * error on the first of the two values.
> + * error on the mentioned two values.
> */
> static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned(struct kunit *test)
> {
> @@ -470,28 +481,7 @@ static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned(struct kunit *test)
> sizeof(uninit_src));
> kmsan_check_memory((void *)dst, 4);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Test case: ensure that memcpy() correctly copies uninitialized values between
> - * aligned `src` and unaligned `dst`.
> - *
> - * Copying aligned 4-byte value to an unaligned one leads to touching two
> - * aligned 4-byte values. This test case checks that KMSAN correctly reports an
> - * error on the second of the two values.
> - */
> -static void test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2(struct kunit *test)
> -{
> - EXPECTATION_UNINIT_VALUE_FN(expect,
> - "test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2");
> - volatile int uninit_src;
> - volatile char dst[8] = { 0 };
> -
> - kunit_info(
> - test,
> - "memcpy()ing aligned uninit src to unaligned dst - part 2 (UMR report)\n");
> - memcpy_noinline((void *)&dst[1], (void *)&uninit_src,
> - sizeof(uninit_src));
> + report_reset();
> kmsan_check_memory((void *)&dst[4], sizeof(uninit_src));
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
> }
> @@ -589,7 +579,6 @@ static struct kunit_case kmsan_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(test_init_memcpy),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_aligned),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned),
> - KUNIT_CASE(test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned2),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memset16),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memset32),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_memset64),
> --
> 2.42.0.283.g2d96d420d3-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-11 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 14:56 [PATCH v2 1/4] kmsan: simplify kmsan_internal_memmove_metadata() Alexander Potapenko
2023-09-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] kmsan: prevent optimizations in memcpy tests Alexander Potapenko
2023-09-11 15:07 ` Marco Elver
2023-09-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] kmsan: merge test_memcpy_aligned_to_unaligned{,2}() together Alexander Potapenko
2023-09-11 15:06 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2023-09-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kmsan: introduce test_memcpy_initialized_gap() Alexander Potapenko
2023-09-11 15:06 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANpmjNP61zOdXR=FYjtzUqcjxg=j_Otqotqv_OTN_Hi2E-LXLg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox